From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Gh9p5-0001uz-GD for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:07:55 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kA6J454F020728; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:04:05 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kA6Ixxht021088 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 19:00:00 GMT Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559E2646A3 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:59:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.215 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.215 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.384, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mGZ+hYQpUEds for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:59:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A15264504 for ; Mon, 6 Nov 2006 18:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Gh9Ti-0006iG-2a for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:45:51 +0100 Received: from c-67-163-25-192.hsd1.in.comcast.net ([67.163.25.192]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:45:50 +0100 Received: from reader by c-67-163-25-192.hsd1.in.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 06 Nov 2006 19:45:50 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Harry Putnam Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: sanba mount on host machine Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 12:13:39 -0600 Organization: Still searching... Message-ID: References: <873b8xwu9r.fsf@newsguy.com> <20061106144834.a9fa29c6.hilse@web.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-67-163-25-192.hsd1.in.comcast.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (windows-nt) Cancel-Lock: sha1:tq/0RM+a5t2K/5p3q2GSvMIFY6A= Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 58fff31d-8d42-42dc-916f-aed2d08bb16a X-Archives-Hash: d01f4caee3785b0a2df8edfab6368472 Hans-Werner Hilse writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, 05 Nov 2006 13:47:12 -0600 reader@newsguy.com wrote: > > Is this possible withou really negative impact of some sort. > > If this is a question (please clarify a bit, and use question marks > when appropriate!): Of course it has a negative impact -- opposed to > built-in storage, which should be faster than network based storage :-) Did you not see the rest of the post? (Reposted below) Is this possible withou[t] really negative impact of some sort:[colon added] Install as many HDD as mobo allows maybe adding a few more with pci controllsers. (all sata if possible) Install Gentoo as host OS on a smallish partition or drive. Mount all remaining drives as CIFS mounts accessable from samba or smb from host or windowsXP clients. All this over gigabit ethernet. > But if you have Windows clients, that's almost the only option you > have. Well, you could go with WebDAV, but I wouldn't recommend that, > it's most probably not nearly as stable as Samba. No, that isn't true. If you mean mounting the hosts HDD as cifs mounts. Windows machines have no trouble accessing host gentoo drives with no special setup other than samba running. > Even for Linux/Unix clients (given they have proper CIFS/SMB support) > Samba is a capable option for a networked file system. It is clear enough that samba and cifs is required to network with windows machines... that I know going in. The question once again was, can one install a working gentoo OS on a machine and then mount some number of the machines on board HDD as cifs mounts to be accessed with samba internally by the host OS as well as thru smb from any networked computers? What I want here is to know if the host OS can be made to see its own native drives as cifs mounted shares. The drives would be formatted NTFS and would be the basis of a home built NAS [Network Attached Storage]. I want them all NTFS to feed a space hungry Event Videography business. I don't want to dink around with mounting as NTFS on linux since it really isn't yet supported, but want to access these drives solely thru samba. > OTOH, there's Windows SFU, which you can use to mount NFS shares, but I > heard it's a pain in the *** to set it up. You heard right. It does work once you understand the setup but then far as I know NFS has some inherent bottleneck to moving large files anyway. (That is hearsay... not from experience.. I had no really large files to move back when I had Windows SFU set up nor was I concerned with that) -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list