From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MViT5-0006wK-Ag for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:55:31 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A6B1DE0263; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mta-1.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (mta-1.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.7.72]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767C7E0263 for ; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 08:55:28 +0000 (UTC) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: INLINE Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=us-ascii Received: from ironport-out-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de ([134.130.5.40]) by mta-1.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008)) with ESMTP id <0KNH00IIWI4FXOF0@mta-1.ms.rz.RWTH-Aachen.de> for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:55:27 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.43,282,1246831200"; d="scan'208";a="20607257" Received: from relay-2.ms.rz.rwth-aachen.de (HELO relay.rwth-aachen.de) ([134.130.7.75]) by ironport-in-1.rz.rwth-aachen.de with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:55:27 +0200 Received: from numa-i.igpm.rwth-aachen.de (numa-i.igpm.RWTH-Aachen.DE [134.130.161.252]) by relay.rwth-aachen.de (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8/1) with ESMTP id n6S8tR0G005729; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:55:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: by numa-i.igpm.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix, from userid 230) id 9B1A31068F0; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:55:31 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 10:55:31 +0200 (CEST) From: Helmut Jarausch Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: cloning + upgrade howto? To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Cc: ABCD In-reply-to: Message-id: References: <20090723080924.2e730943@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <4A686729.4040103@anferny.me.uk> <20090723153619.4e197704@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <4A6D6661.6040204@anferny.me.uk> <20090727100533.1a5da289@krikkit.digimed.co.uk> <20090727224655.5a886b5e@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> X-Archives-Salt: d6299838-1df2-438a-b6be-e03d5b0f7098 X-Archives-Hash: a0ed454a8c6ad53c399130720b8b269f On 27 Jul, ABCD wrote: > I believe the mask is still in place because of a couple issues with sets, > as well as issues with FEATURES=preserve-libs. I don't think so. I'm using the bleeding egde portage since several months now without any problems. These have been mask for 'political' reasons - see an urlier thread of mine. We - the user - should be forced to test the previous version. I think this is a shame and several people on this list seemed to agree. Helmut. -- Helmut Jarausch Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische Mathematik RWTH - Aachen University D 52056 Aachen, Germany