From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-190402-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11140138350
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu,  9 Apr 2020 07:32:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8E2B1E09CD;
	Thu,  9 Apr 2020 07:32:33 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ciao.gmane.io (ciao.gmane.io [159.69.161.202])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6E77E09A2
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu,  9 Apr 2020 07:32:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane-mx.org>)
	id 1jMRfr-0002Nw-6l
	for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 09:32:31 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: <nunojsilva@ist.utl.pt> (Nuno Silva)
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: sci-libs/spqr-1.2.3-r1 failed to emerge
Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2020 08:32:26 +0100
Message-ID: <r6mj2a$2jis$1@ciao.gmane.io>
References: <CA+t6X7eu4p=iNogTL0uSoMf1RjDXbi5Ou3FNoq1fJifa7J4S+w@mail.gmail.com>
	<r6k920$qtr$1@ciao.gmane.io>
	<CA+t6X7dWxMdHKWSroBfOYW5nbSKJvoNbfFf1N9Cn3U_0zAKKfA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+t6X7ecFMtp+7_S_TRW50LqcyyuEUR4X31f489KmN2ZOoTotw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20200408140010.5edf66d4@digimed.co.uk>
	<CA+t6X7esb7BbCmG9OC=o_7tbeq3XKsivE0R=DvibkKuGQCTLUg@mail.gmail.com>
	<972497a2-a3b5-dda7-422a-2029b69831f0@gentoo.org>
	<CA+t6X7dbN1zb_nnWUp-hiqhtchvn1Wp4N3nu=shopqC4bt_52A@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+t6X7dOAQ2bDOyeN9nBQgO4uLEzCVSRFMiU_8c_dFZkMJeFyA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux)
X-Archives-Salt: f7bf6131-54be-4419-8357-a5f23e954f50
X-Archives-Hash: b196653bb0fa7e6270325874f9147e52

On 2020-04-09, gevisz wrote:

> ср, 8 апр. 2020 г. в 19:31, gevisz <gevisz@gmail.com>:
>>
>> ср, 8 апр. 2020 г. в 18:13, Michael Orlitzky <mjo@gentoo.org>:
>> >
>> > The other thing you should be aware of is that dev-lang/julia is, from a
>> > software engineering point of view, an absolute trainwreck (upstream,
>> > not the Gentoo maintainer's fault). Your experience so far is going to
>> > be typical, I fear.
>>
>> After I added all these files to the
>> /etc/portage/package.accept_keywords/julia file,
>> julia finally emerged. Thank you. However, I am affraid what will be
>> when I try to update my Gentoo system in a month or so.
>
> A small addition: I've just noticed that I've managed to emerge only
> julia-1.3.0;
> julia-1.4.0-r1 still fails to be emerged (at a compile phase).

What errors?

There is bug 716434[1] where julia fails because it tries to download
more tarballs (yes, during compilation). An ebuild change was made to
address this, so it might be worth syncing the tree and trying to emerge
again.

[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=716434

-- 
Nuno Silva