From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E434A1382BE for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CBF5321C018; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:39:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org (mx-out.ukfsn.org [77.75.108.125]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A3721C005 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9625C6E1A for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:37:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ukfsn.org ([77.75.108.125]) by localhost (smtp-filter.ukfsn.org [192.168.54.205]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iMckdbePUlQR for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:37:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: by mail.ukfsn.org (Postfix, from userid 33) id 8818DC6E18; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 21:37:37 +0000 (GMT) To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone succeeded with kmail2? Received: from 78.32.181.186 (auth. user humphrey@ukfsn.org) by www.ukfsn.org with HTTP; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:37:37 +0100 To: "gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org" Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anyone succeeded with kmail2? Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:37:37 +0100 X-Mailer: IlohaMail/0.8.14 (On: www.ukfsn.org) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <50E656E1.8040001@electronsweatshop.com> From: "Peter Humphrey" Bounce-To: "Peter Humphrey" Errors-To: "Peter Humphrey" Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: b9e1627e-a30f-49ad-9583-240cc44840e8 X-Archives-Hash: dacb910fc699cd532e7bfdf66effb502 On 4/1/2013, "Randy Barlow" wrote: >On 01/03/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on the >> mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc with the keyboard. I've >> seen Evolution recommended; is that OK? > >Thunderbird is my favorite mail client. You can do a lot with the KB. >For example, go to next read mail is just 'n' for next. CTRL-R for >reply. It's not bad to learn the shortcuts. Plus it has a lot of great >features and extensions. I'm trying to set Thunderbird up, but I'm not telling it the right values to connect to my ISP's POP server. I suppose I should have a rest and try again tomorrow. Thanks for the recommendation. >For CLI clients, I sometimes use Mutt. It's a little bit of a pain to >configure for IMAP, but once you get it going it's pretty cool. I may even have to resort to Mutt if I can't get anything else running. What a state to be in in 2013! (I don't imply that Mutt's not good, just that Kmail should never have been released in its present state. Doesn't anyone ever learn?)