From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1FB138334 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:33:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF2DEE097A; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blaine.gmane.org (unknown [195.159.176.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 665E0E07FE for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 10:33:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1g4O97-0007I8-SL for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:31:17 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Trouble on the horizon! Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 13:33:23 +0300 Message-ID: References: <78ec1a64-33a4-5b24-9aff-2f1c3935867b@verizon.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Archives-Salt: 76e376ca-22a7-48a0-a643-83fbb21110f4 X-Archives-Hash: d4f18dbe2c847671da6c0d6f30c49dd1 On 24/09/2018 13:11, R0b0t1 wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2018 at 11:01 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> >> To me it looks like youtubers and some sites trying to make money through >> clickbait? >> > > If you had not heard of it elsewhere the Linux code of conduct was > amended. It makes the CoC similar to those of other projects where > there are a number of (usually nontechnical) contributors who identify > as a champion of social justice. > [...] Well, if kernel developers are fine with that, then I don't see how that's relevant to anyone who isn't a kernel dev. If they want to adopt social justice politics, that's really their prerogative.