From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1RgFpE-0007qw-Vq for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:15:17 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFFF221C148; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:14:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E398121C03C for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:13:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EC31B401B for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:13:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.244 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.244 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.344, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.288, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PewoEt0FDxCd for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B1C91B401F for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 13:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RgFnT-0002Wp-2m for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:13:27 +0100 Received: from p5086caf7.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.134.202.247]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:13:27 +0100 Received: from holger.hoffstaette by p5086caf7.dip.t-dialin.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:13:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: "Holger Hoffstaette" Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: CLI Torrent client(s)? Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 14:13:02 +0100 Organization: The Fists of the White Lotus Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p5086caf7.dip.t-dialin.net User-Agent: Pan/0.13.91 (Before we let euphoria convince us we are free) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: a966147f-1164-4ad2-aba4-3ea5acf4aa38 X-Archives-Hash: 70d2c511a9bd859275f4b2306c26c30f On Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:07:10 +0700, Pandu Poluan wrote: > I'm wondering: what's your recommended CLI Torrent client(s)? And why? deluge has explicit separation between server and clients, so whether one uses the web, remote-GUI or cli simply becomes a matter of choice. Most of the time I use the remote GUI from my Windows laptop to control the server on my Linux box, but occasionally I also use the server-local cli directly. It's not super-feature-rich, but has shell-like completion and does what one would expect. Very happy. This model is different (and IMHO much better) from many other cli torren= t clients which require you to keep the shell open, or use screen. -h