Re: [gentoo-user] memory leak with gtk+-2.8.20-r1

[gwe <gwenjo@free.fr>]

Le Wed, 02 Aug 2006 13:20:07 +0200, Hans-Werner Hilse a écrit :

> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 12:58:33 +0200 gwe <gwenjo@free.fr> wrote:
> 
>> Someone has the same problem or an solution to solve this leak of
>> memory? Thank you very much.
> 
> You should at least describe the problem you have. You're just
> describing the things you've tried to nail it down, but what are the
> symptoms? What makes you think there's a memory leak in your program?
> 
> -hwh
I'm sorry
I post only the end of log file of valgrind (the entire file is very big
~22500 lines).
This is the result of execute the source code :
==13767== LEAK SUMMARY:
==13767==    definitely lost: 36 bytes in 1 blocks.
==13767==    indirectly lost: 120 bytes in 10 blocks.
==13767==      possibly lost: 40,264 bytes in 47 blocks.
==13767==    still reachable: 118,673 bytes in 1,963 blocks.
==13767==         suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks.
--13767--  memcheck: sanity checks: 59 cheap, 3 expensive
--13767--  memcheck: auxmaps: 0 auxmap entries (0k, 0M) in use
--13767--  memcheck: auxmaps: 0 searches, 0 comparisons
--13767--  memcheck: secondaries: 53 issued (3392k, 3M)
--13767--  memcheck: secondaries: 115 accessible and distinguished (7360k, 7M)
--13767--     tt/tc: 46,665 tt lookups requiring 56,738 probes
--13767--     tt/tc: 46,665 fast-cache updates, 8 flushes
--13767-- translate: new        19,998 (425,678 -> 6,983,632; ratio 164:10) [0 scs]
--13767-- translate: dumped     0 (0 -> ??)
--13767-- translate: discarded  209 (3,781 -> ??)
--13767-- scheduler: 2,984,389 jumps (bb entries).
--13767-- scheduler: 59/33,828 major/minor sched events.
--13767--    sanity: 60 cheap, 3 expensive checks.
--13767--    exectx: 30,011 lists, 4,057 contexts (avg 0 per list)
--13767--    exectx: 6,894 searches, 3,112 full compares (451 per 1000)
--13767--    exectx: 0 cmp2, 196 cmp4, 1,062,968 cmpAll

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list