From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FPIuQ-0004XJ-8U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:39:22 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with SMTP id k2VCcing029704; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:38:44 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.6/8.13.5) with ESMTP id k2VCYdhK008099 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:34:39 GMT Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.54) id 1FPIpq-0003wx-PB for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 12:34:38 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1FPIpi-0003Ev-2N for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:34:30 +0200 Received: from c-68-39-44-30.hsd1.nj.comcast.net ([68.39.44.30]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:34:30 +0200 Received: from pete4abw by c-68-39-44-30.hsd1.nj.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:34:30 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Peter Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 07:34:24 -0500 Message-ID: References: <44232EC1.2090708@infoline.su> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-68-39-44-30.hsd1.nj.comcast.net User-Agent: Pan/0.14.2.91 (As She Crawled Across the Table) X-Archive: encrypt Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: d8605666-33f3-4ed9-8fd4-a78c7de36a03 X-Archives-Hash: 5905eb630c7dda21a9f95dacfb091197 On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 02:26:57 +0300, Alexander Kirillov wrote: > Hi all, > > I needed to restart sendmail more than once after upgrade > and noticed the script always produces these warnings: > > # /etc/init.d/sendmail restart > * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... > * Stopping sendmail ... [ok] > * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... > * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... > * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... > * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... > * Starting sendmail ... [ok] > > What might be wrong here? > > TIA, > Sasha I have seen this too recently with samba, vmware, ntpd, privoxy and others (but not always) during both startup and shutdown sequences. I think something has changed in the init scripts. Everything seems to work OK and there is nothing in the logs indicating anything wrong. Example: mars peter # /etc/init.d/privoxy stop * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... * Stopping privoxy ... [ ok ] mars peter # /etc/init.d/privoxy start * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... * Re-caching dependency info (mtimes differ)... * Starting privoxy ... [ ok ] Not sure what's being cached or recached. Makes no sense to me. Ideas? -- Peter -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list