From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NPzNR-000648-86 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:18:20 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2869FE0952; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.147]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE203E0952 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 3so2555160eyh.40 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:17:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:to:subject:references :content-type:from:date:message-id:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=XiYSbYi7vETL1ojJUzH6JVxjwX0AAjgMIC/yYE4mUg4=; b=H8nrzB4CCk7gDWsBV0GJ8sOw5Ptly7NsjEVZmz0MJ40OwliUBR1XJSZNJphomzswn6 mOeLhXBjVybX4144VC893AVquL10UDR94R0jpMZsGKrR6WueZhKUi/bSJVi/GaZ7GFYo F/gi+wb3/CULYzZUXgOszX3OQB4alcylRgsdc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=to:subject:references:content-type:from:date:message-id:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=bHWbOknyDqLa26KMHOyI9YFn8+n1Yy+GwSisJQn5ZOMd5y7MCwNuCYkuyJh6nQO93m 3/IUnTfdR2WMmN487v1uc1UHBZxkja0OIkSbd40+qJOAKG7nATGSaypbI613EnZOrXLu IhXEXTuUnD4n01AGDo5z6aq4eoQkttUnju4so= Received: by 10.213.109.148 with SMTP id j20mr17861455ebp.2.1262182669974; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:17:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from zeerak (0110ds1-abc.0.fullrate.dk [90.185.49.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm28101942eya.19.2009.12.30.06.17.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 30 Dec 2009 06:17:49 -0800 (PST) To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] subclipse??? References: <5bdc1c8b0912291753p46880ce8ta8e4d7e29561ab1f@mail.gmail.com> <20091230102712.3b05b5ae@digimed.co.uk> <200912301244.52527.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <5bdc1c8b0912300558w853c5c8h5329242cbc638c56@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; delsp=yes From: "Zeerak Waseem" Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 15:17:16 +0100 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5bdc1c8b0912300558w853c5c8h5329242cbc638c56@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.10 (Linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: fa0b7028-03ca-43ac-8a85-f7258ed74433 X-Archives-Hash: 3e450936720f80471007d34464040aad The eix-remote -q update command should take care of that. Try running it and searching for something that you know isn't in one of the overlays that you use :-) On Wed, 30 Dec 2009 14:58:44 +0100, Mark Knecht wrote: > On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Alan McKinnon > wrote: >> On Wednesday 30 December 2009 12:27:12 Neil Bothwick wrote: >> >> I think he wants to know what overlay a given ebuild is in without >> installing >> the overlay first >> >> eix wwon't show the contents of not-installed overlays > > Yes, thanks Alan. That is what I was asking. I guess I should have > posted that eix subsclipse showed nothing on my machines: > > dragonfly ~ # eix subclipse > No matches found. > dragonfly ~ # > > After adding the trauma overlay with layman now I see it: > > dragonfly ~ # layman -l > * trauma [Subversion] > (http://svn.digital-trauma.de/gentoo/trunk/ ) > dragonfly ~ # eix subclipse > * dev-util/eclipse-subclipse-bin [1] > Available versions: 1.1.9!s 1.2.0!s > Homepage: http://subclipse.tigris.org/ > Description: Subversion support for Eclipse (binary) > > [1] "digital-trauma.de" /usr/local/portage/layman/trauma > dragonfly ~ # > > but how do I determine that it's in trauma in the first place? > > This came up the other day where Grant was asking about rt-sources and > I was able to answer because I use it and knew which overlay to tell > him to add, but then I hit the wall myself and didn't know how to > figure this out short of adding all overlays which seemed silly. > > I had hoped that layman would have a way to search non-installed > overlays but I didn't find that so I asked here. > > And thanks to Neil who at least told me what overlay had a binary > version. Unfortunately it appears it an older version of subclipse > that's not intended for use with eclipse-3.5. > > Thanks, > Mark >