* [gentoo-user] Why does portage want to downgrade Grub?
@ 2015-12-12 15:39 Nikos Chantziaras
2015-12-12 16:02 ` Mike Gilbert
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nikos Chantziaras @ 2015-12-12 15:39 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
emerge -auDN @world
...
[ebuild UD ] sys-boot/grub-2.00_p5107-r2 [2.02_beta2-r7]
USE="-custom-cflags%" GRUB_PLATFORMS="-yeeloong%"
I currently have 2.02_beta2-r7 installed. It's not masked or anything.
But portage wants to downgrade to 2.00_p5107-r2.
I don't have any clue why that is.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Why does portage want to downgrade Grub?
2015-12-12 15:39 [gentoo-user] Why does portage want to downgrade Grub? Nikos Chantziaras
@ 2015-12-12 16:02 ` Mike Gilbert
2015-12-12 16:19 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mike Gilbert @ 2015-12-12 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com> wrote:
> emerge -auDN @world
> ...
> [ebuild UD ] sys-boot/grub-2.00_p5107-r2 [2.02_beta2-r7]
> USE="-custom-cflags%" GRUB_PLATFORMS="-yeeloong%"
>
>
> I currently have 2.02_beta2-r7 installed. It's not masked or anything. But
> portage wants to downgrade to 2.00_p5107-r2.
>
> I don't have any clue why that is.
Possibly a bad Manifest entry. rsync has been pretty broken this week.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: Why does portage want to downgrade Grub?
2015-12-12 16:02 ` Mike Gilbert
@ 2015-12-12 16:19 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2015-12-12 22:56 ` Neil Bothwick
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nikos Chantziaras @ 2015-12-12 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 12/12/15 18:02, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com> wrote:
>> emerge -auDN @world
>> ...
>> [ebuild UD ] sys-boot/grub-2.00_p5107-r2 [2.02_beta2-r7]
>> USE="-custom-cflags%" GRUB_PLATFORMS="-yeeloong%"
>>
>>
>> I currently have 2.02_beta2-r7 installed. It's not masked or anything. But
>> portage wants to downgrade to 2.00_p5107-r2.
>>
>> I don't have any clue why that is.
>
> Possibly a bad Manifest entry. rsync has been pretty broken this week.
Hm, indeed. grub-0.97-r16.ebuild was missing from the manifest, but it's
weird that this would affect 2.02_beta2-r7. It shouldn't, right?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Why does portage want to downgrade Grub?
2015-12-12 16:19 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
@ 2015-12-12 22:56 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-12-13 2:44 ` Nikos Chantziaras
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2015-12-12 22:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 999 bytes --]
On 12 December 2015 16:19:52 GMT+00:00, Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 12/12/15 18:02, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Nikos Chantziaras
> <realnc@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> emerge -auDN @world
> >> ...
> >> [ebuild UD ] sys-boot/grub-2.00_p5107-r2 [2.02_beta2-r7]
> >> USE="-custom-cflags%" GRUB_PLATFORMS="-yeeloong%"
> >>
> >>
> >> I currently have 2.02_beta2-r7 installed. It's not masked or
> anything. But
> >> portage wants to downgrade to 2.00_p5107-r2.
> >>
> >> I don't have any clue why that is.
> >
> > Possibly a bad Manifest entry. rsync has been pretty broken this
> week.
>
> Hm, indeed. grub-0.97-r16.ebuild was missing from the manifest, but
> it's
> weird that this would affect 2.02_beta2-r7. It shouldn't, right?
If the manifest fails, all ebuilds in that directory are considered suspect. Is the version portage wants to downgrade to in an overlay?
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1566 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: Why does portage want to downgrade Grub?
2015-12-12 22:56 ` Neil Bothwick
@ 2015-12-13 2:44 ` Nikos Chantziaras
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Nikos Chantziaras @ 2015-12-13 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 13/12/15 00:56, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Hm, indeed. grub-0.97-r16.ebuild was missing from the manifest, but it's
> weird that this would affect 2.02_beta2-r7. It
> shouldn't, right?
>
> If the manifest fails, all ebuilds in that directory are considered
> suspect. Is the version portage wants to downgrade to in an overlay?
Nope. Portage-tree only.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-13 2:45 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-12 15:39 [gentoo-user] Why does portage want to downgrade Grub? Nikos Chantziaras
2015-12-12 16:02 ` Mike Gilbert
2015-12-12 16:19 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2015-12-12 22:56 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-12-13 2:44 ` Nikos Chantziaras
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox