From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D3B13888F for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 245C721C02B; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3403D21C009 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn6N5-0002xE-41 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:52:39 +0200 Received: from 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net ([67.130.15.94]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:52:39 +0200 Received: from grant.b.edwards by 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:52:39 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Grant Edwards Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Technical imap mail question Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:52:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20151015100422.55984dd8@a6> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net User-Agent: slrn/1.0.2 (Linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: bedec8c1-7ef7-4faf-8ced-a8b21a243f61 X-Archives-Hash: 8835c4214712ebe70473555923a63cfb On 2015-10-15, walt wrote: > Why would I use a different smtp server if I'm now using imap? I use > smtp to send mail, and imap to read it, right? Why not use the same > smtp server in either case? The only thing I can imagine is that perhaps when you send via the "imap" smtp server, it saves a copy of the outbound mail in a "sent" IMAP folder. I've never actually seen a setup like that, and I doubt that's the real answer. > (The different server names actually resolve to the same IP address, so > the distinction seems to be more theoretical than real, but the theory > is what puzzles me.) Sounds like a normal low-level SNAFU to me... -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! Can you MAIL a BEAN at CAKE? gmail.com