From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53321138CD3 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 01:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6CE8E0845; Tue, 26 May 2015 01:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8185E078C for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 01:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Yx3eN-0001Xh-T5 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 03:27:24 +0200 Received: from athedsl-350670.home.otenet.gr ([85.72.225.108]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 03:27:23 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-350670.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 03:27:23 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: [~and64] Headsup for google-chrome users Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 04:27:17 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-350670.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 727b570a-c923-4c6d-a61e-d96876bef29d X-Archives-Hash: e1912ff79efbdce4974814384b64622b On 21/05/15 17:05, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 8:55 AM, walt wrote: >> I just wasted some time figuring out this mess: >> >> I just updated google-chrome, which printed this confusing warning message: >> >> "CONFIG_USED_NS not seen when it should be" >> >> First, there's a typo: it should read "CONFIG_USER_NS" >> ^ >> > > Sorry about that. It's been fixed. Is the bug referenced in the eclass correct? # Warn if the kernel does not support features needed for sandboxing. # Bug #363987. That's: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=363987 Doesn't seem relevant.