From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E42E138C9D for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 07:02:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A2EEE08F7; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 07:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82B69E0857 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 07:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YmGaK-0004RQ-G3 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 09:02:36 +0200 Received: from pc123.math.cas.cz ([147.231.88.123]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 09:02:36 +0200 Received: from martin by pc123.math.cas.cz with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 09:02:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Martin Vaeth Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc-5.0 ? Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 07:02:23 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pc123.math.cas.cz User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: acfb6a1f-7ae3-4c20-aa80-07c4ee8a6313 X-Archives-Hash: 9a2dbdb71fe2ae43a2154cad0e0fc91f Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > Now that 5.1 is in Portage (masked), you should keep in mind that > emerging it will result in the 5.1 libraries being used, even if you > keep 4.9 (or 4.8) as the default compiler. If you should really get problems with this, you can manually remove the corresponding *5.1* line(s) from /etc/ld.so.conf.d/05gcc-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.conf or change the order and then call env-update. Note that calling gcc-config afterwards would recreate your original file again, so you do not really have to safe it. However, so far I had no problems. OTOH, I do not use a heavy C++ desktop and had already recompiled practically everything with 4.9