From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36830138CA2 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:19:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DBF00E092E; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D32C9E090B for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 15:19:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YkwQk-0008C5-Ej for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:19:14 +0200 Received: from ppp-2-86-253-206.home.otenet.gr ([2.86.253.206]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:19:14 +0200 Received: from realnc by ppp-2-86-253-206.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 17:19:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc-5.0 ? Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:18:54 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: <20150421183919.1dc1c618@hactar.digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-2-86-253-206.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: 8e8abc83-42d8-4572-aab4-281b3af0f6c8 X-Archives-Hash: 377eb268c611e2d8ebb530213d2c2a4e On 22/04/15 17:58, james wrote: > Nikos Chantziaras gmail.com> writes: > >> >> On 21/04/15 21:14, james wrote: >>> How do you tell if a ~9999 is actually based on the nightlies, >>> 5.1 or is just old ebuild with the .9999 extension somebody never >>> got around to renaming or deleting? >> >> 9999 are live ebuilds. Not based on any release or nightlies. They >> download the code from a version control repository (Git, Svn, etc.) in >> whatever state it currently is and build from that. The version before >> the 9999 usually specifies the branch. For example, 5.0.9999 would mean >> the latest state of the 5.0 branch (or whatever branch name would apply >> to that version, like "stable".) >> > > Agreeded. Look at this gcc.9999.ebuild and you tell me what version > it is (Overlay: chromiumos (layman): > > http://gpo.zugaina.org/sys-devel/gcc Lack of a version number always suggests latest "master" branch. However, these are Chromium OS overlays. I don't think you're supposed to be using them on Gentoo. They're for Chromium OS. For all you know, that live ebuild can refer to the master branch of Google's GCC branch, and it might not even build or work correctly as a Gentoo compiler.