From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACF60138CC0 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:57:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 42BEEE0920; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13166E08F3 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YYY8o-0007A9-OM for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:57:31 +0100 Received: from 216.240.144.35 ([216.240.144.35]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:57:30 +0100 Received: from w41ter by 216.240.144.35 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Mar 2015 11:57:30 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Is this a bug in firefox-36.0? Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 03:57:05 -0700 Message-ID: References: <3321648.fbEnVcYaRz@navi> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.240.144.35 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 In-Reply-To: <3321648.fbEnVcYaRz@navi> X-Archives-Salt: 3fc5057f-7884-4d96-822c-d684fca699f4 X-Archives-Hash: 4f7a6448b1ab2c4cdc4b3105e98f4cff On 03/18/2015 06:06 PM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 4:41:25 PM walt wrote: >> On 03/17/2015 04:49 PM, walt wrote: >>> I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com >>> using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76. >> >> Thanks to all who replied. I'm surprised by the variety of different results >> you reported. >> >> (BTW, I'm running firefox-bin-36.0, so the behavior may be a bit different > from >> the gentoo build.) >> >> FF will not even show me the secure att.com webpage. I get an entire html > page >> with this (very big) error message: >> >> Secure Connection Failed >> >> An error occurred during a connection to www.att.com. The OCSP server > experienced >> an internal error. (Error code: sec_error_ocsp_server_error) >> >> The page you are trying to view cannot be shown because the authenticity of > the >> received data could not be verified. >> >> Please contact the website owners to inform them of this problem. >> >> > > That sounds more like a networking issue. Are you behind a firewall? Is it > possible that you somehow blocked their OCSP server? Can you bypass the > firewall for testing? Wow, creepy. I forced a warm reboot of my home wireless router and the problem went away. I now see the gray triangle with the ! and I have no idea how long ago that started. I probably just didn't notice it until this router screw-up happened. And I don't even want to think about why my home router suddenly changed behavior :(