From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56378138CBF for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 23:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E1BD1E0A83; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 23:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B17C0E0A07 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2015 23:50:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YY1FK-0006c4-KN for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:50:03 +0100 Received: from 64.69.39.75 ([64.69.39.75]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:50:02 +0100 Received: from w41ter by 64.69.39.75 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2015 00:50:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: walt Subject: [gentoo-user] Is this a bug in firefox-36.0? Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 16:49:54 -0700 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.69.39.75 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 X-Archives-Salt: edc95b5d-fe1c-414c-81cb-e2a3a2195dab X-Archives-Hash: e35235b7b8b3a33a28ba48f1843ba3ff I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76. Anyone else see the same with firefox-36? BTW, I tried the latest firefox in a Win7 virtual machine and I was shocked to see that firefox was updating itself when I was logged in as an unprivileged user (i.e. *not* an Administrator). Are the idiots at M$ *really* that stupid? They've learned nothing, apparently, since Win 95 :( BTW, the Win7 firefox also flagged an error when visiting the web site I mentioned above, but the error was displayed so subtly that I would have missed it if I hadn't been looking for it specifically. Very bad behavior.