From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5775138CC4 for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1954EE096B; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:30:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8410EE093D for ; Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:30:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YUyh1-00039t-21 for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:30:03 +0100 Received: from 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net ([67.130.15.94]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:30:03 +0100 Received: from grant.b.edwards by 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Mar 2015 15:30:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Grant Edwards Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Replacement for acroread on 64bit system? Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2015 14:27:33 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (Linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 5a13a3fd-670e-4b11-8d21-2b1157dc53aa X-Archives-Hash: 9f1779384466f5419314a5d31e88aec6 On 2015-03-07, James wrote: > Grant Edwards gmail.com> writes: > > >> I'm not sure what changed, but as of a few weeks ago I can no longer >> install acroread on my AMD64 system (something to do with x86 >> emulation librarys being blocked by something in the Xorg server). > > Hello Grant, > > I do not remember doing anything special, but acroread works for > me on amd64 with, these: It used to work for me as well, but now it's blocked: alpha grante # emerge -av acroread These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild N ] dev-util/bsdiff-4.3-r3 6 KiB [ebuild N ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20140508 USE="(development) -opengl" ABI_X86="(-32)" 0 KiB [ebuild N ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-opengl-20140508 USE="development" ABI_X86="(-32)" 0 KiB [ebuild N ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-gtklibs-20140508-r3 USE="development" ABI_X86="(-32)" 0 KiB [ebuild N ] app-text/acroread-9.5.5-r2 USE="nsplugin -html -ldap" LINGUAS="-ja -ko -zh_CN -zh_TW" 0 KiB [blocks B ] app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs[-abi_x86_32(-)] ("app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs[-abi_x86_32(-)]" is blocking dev-libs/libevdev-1.3) Total: 5 packages (5 new), Size of downloads: 6 KiB Conflict: 1 block (1 unsatisfied) * Error: The above package list contains packages which cannot be * installed at the same time on the same system. (app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20140508:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by ~app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20140508 required by (app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-gtklibs-20140508-r3:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs[-abi_x86_32(-)] required by (app-text/acroread-9.5.5-r2:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) >=app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-xlibs-20100611 required by (app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-opengl-20140508:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) (dev-libs/libevdev-1.3:0/0::gentoo, installed) pulled in by dev-libs/libevdev required by (x11-drivers/xf86-input-evdev-2.9.1:0/0::gentoo, installed) I've probably got the ABI_X86 stuff set incorrectly, but I've never been able to find understandable documentation on how that's supposed to be configured on an AMD64 system where you need to support a few 32-bit apps. -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! JAPAN is a WONDERFUL at planet -- I wonder if we'll gmail.com ever reach their level of COMPARATIVE SHOPPING ...