From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC4D9138350 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 00:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E799E0BA8; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 00:15:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from covici.com (debian-2.covici.com [166.84.7.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 007F8E0B09 for ; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 00:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ccs.covici.com (ccs.covici.com [70.109.53.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by covici.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Debian-14~deb10u1) with ESMTPSA id 03N0FM1n014148 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:15:23 -0400 Received: from ccs.covici.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ccs.covici.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 03N0FEso1251876 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:15:14 -0400 Received: (from covici@localhost) by ccs.covici.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 03N0FEhs1251875; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:15:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 20:15:14 -0400 Message-ID: From: John Covici To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo dead? In-Reply-To: References: <20200421165803.GB187193@redacted> <20200421183317.GC187193@redacted> <877dy8isdu.fsf@wedjat.horus-it.com> <20200421190035.GE187193@redacted> <8ca01aef-6df7-f4cb-7e37-5459a1009fbd@gmail.com> <0510a8e0-a427-7b6a-e795-dcfab6dcb372@gmail.com> <80198011-e783-e3ff-6e05-0232143953b6@gentoo.org> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/26 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Organization: Covici Computer Systems Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Archives-Salt: 56bff395-cf6f-4711-a92d-5385a4f0bfa0 X-Archives-Hash: aaded88cedcd500c00e2d83ea95b213b On Wed, 22 Apr 2020 13:30:32 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > On 4/22/20 1:19 PM, John Covici wrote: > > > > That makes no sense to me -- portage itself says those files are owned > > by 14.7.1965(14) so if its telling me that why does it not just > > replace those files? > > > > Aha, you're not doing anything wrong. The old 14.7.x version was slotted: > > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/diff/net-misc/teamviewer/teamviewer-14.7.1965.ebuild?id=2766d49e7c040d373685775a4515967cd0f1b33e > > The new ones aren't (they're all SLOT=0). But the new ones install to > the same place as the old 14.7.x versions. Since slotted packages aren't > supposed to conflict, it's complaining that SLOT=0 and SLOT=14.7 (or > whatever it was) are trying to install to the same place. > > I guess the developer never noticed the problem because he was on a > faster upgrade schedule. You can fix it by uninstalling the old version > manually, and then installing the new one. > OK, manually unmerging and re-emerging did the trick -- thanks all for your help. -- Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: How do you spend it? John Covici wb2una covici@ccs.covici.com