Re: [gentoo-user] What to do about openssl

[John Covici <covici@ccs.covici.com>]

On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 11:38:04 -0400,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> 
> [1  <text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
> Hi John
> 
> All version 1.x have been masked. They are very very old and have obsolete
> code.
> 
> Upgrade to v3.x - this is what portage is telling you.
> 
> Is there some reason you require v1.1.x? Do you have a local mask for
> openssl?
> 
> Alan
> 
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 5:34 PM John Covici <covici@ccs.covici.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi.  I just did a world update and found that my openssl-1.1.1v is
> > masked.  What can I do, I don't have any version that is not masked
> > and according to the message this version is EOL.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
> > How do
> > you spend it?
> >
> >          John Covici wb2una
> >          covici@ccs.covici.com
> >
> >
> 
> -- 
> Alan McKinnon
All of the v3 packages are masked in my repository, just updated a
couple of days ago.

Here is what I get
Available versions:  [M]1.0.2u-r1^td [M]1.1.1u(0/1.1)^t{xpak}
[M](~)1.1.1v(0/1.1)^t{xpak} [M](~)1.1.1w(0/1.1)^t [m]3.0.9-r1(0/3)^t
[m]3.0.9-r2(0/3)^t [m]3.0.10(0/3)^t [m](~)3.0.11(0/3)^t
[m](~)3.1.1-r1(0/3)^t [m](~)3.1.1-r2(0/3)^t [m](~)3.1.2(0/3)^t
[m](~)3.1.3(0/3)^t {+asm bindist fips gmp kerberos ktls rfc3779 sctp
sslv2 (+)sslv3 static-libs test tls-compression (+)tls-heartbeat
vanilla verify-sig weak-ssl-ciphers ABI_MIPS="n32 n64 o32"
ABI_S390="32 64" ABI_X86="32 64
x32" CPU_FLAGS_X86="sse2"}


-- 
Your life is like a penny.  You're going to lose it.  The question is:
How do
you spend it?

         John Covici wb2una
         covici@ccs.covici.com