From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8641388E5 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:37:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 904EAE07E2; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 603EAE07C2 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:37:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37E853403C8 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:37:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.005 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.005 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.191, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lyc4SAz5jEFO for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BA31340340 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XjRYw-0000IH-8O for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:37:14 +0100 Received: from biff2.math.uni-rostock.de ([139.30.30.69]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:37:14 +0100 Received: from martin by biff2.math.uni-rostock.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 29 Oct 2014 12:37:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Martin Vaeth Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Moving the portage tree to /var Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 11:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4473472.7D6UrCk1jI@wstn> <201410072248.36414.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <201410072303.55841.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <544BAC39.3050505@libertytrek.org> <544BD391.7070102@gentoo.org> <544E6895.6010207@libertytrek.org> <544E97C2.2060008@gmail.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: biff2.math.uni-rostock.de User-Agent: slrn/pre1.0.0-18 (Linux) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 398511fc-b0f2-4867-8e6f-5e1514e4e921 X-Archives-Hash: 1ee8c2c02c5f396657da7e4266306cb3 Mike Gilbert wrote: > > I'm not sure if the portage team has decided what to do long-term. The long-term plans are to drop PORTDIR and PORTDIR_OVERLAY completely, the reason being that it is not flexible enough: With repos.conf you can specify details for every repository, you are not even forced to have a *single* major repository (AFAIK, this is called mix-ins in some other package managers), etc.