From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FAE138827 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:36:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F02E1E084D; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:36:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3E1AE0802 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C97934047D for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:36:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.96 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.96 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.170, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.43, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v8Ajgk0rI2PR for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:35:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FD78340301 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 01:35:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xgkq7-0006vl-DF for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:35:51 +0200 Received: from athedsl-232232.home.otenet.gr ([85.74.226.198]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:35:51 +0200 Received: from realnc by athedsl-232232.home.otenet.gr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 03:35:51 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: Nikos Chantziaras Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: gigabyte mobo latency Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 04:35:39 +0300 Organization: Lucas Barks Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: athedsl-232232.home.otenet.gr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 In-Reply-To: X-Archives-Salt: f180229b-6ae2-40c5-9fa1-9924512b3a2a X-Archives-Hash: 261bef9b70c8bc8c09169ea73242cc52 On 18/10/14 18:49, James wrote: > Often the latency is minimal and the system response (as guaged) > from the keyboard is fine (quick). Other times the active terminal > session is a pig mostly in the web browser windows. Try different browsers. See for example if Chrome (or Chromium) behaves better than Seamonkey or Firefox. Since different browsers use different javascript implementations, you could be getting rather large performance differences. Worth a try.