From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-159146-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 431AD13838B
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:57:45 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AA10FE09DA;
Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:57:36 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FCDBE09D1
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:57:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDB2340020
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:57:34 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.919
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.919 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
tests=[AWL=0.693, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01]
autolearn=no
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id CIgWvbs9sFr9 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:57:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6684533FEDE
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 09:57:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
id 1Xb52j-0006Rb-1K
for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:57:25 +0200
Received: from ppp118-209-130-183.lns20.mel8.internode.on.net ([118.209.130.183])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:57:25 +0200
Received: from kensington by ppp118-209-130-183.lns20.mel8.internode.on.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 11:57:25 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: Michael Palimaka <kensington@gentoo.org>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: has anyone tried KDE5?
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 20:57:14 +1100
Message-ID: <m0tp1p$tpf$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <CAO5-k+qo2D_7AAA9LMgbUwpvR5_6FyJKi+GyVeqKgrUVVc+nsw@mail.gmail.com> <m0pb7v$dm8$1@ger.gmane.org> <54318F19.1090701@googlemail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp118-209-130-183.lns20.mel8.internode.on.net
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.1
In-Reply-To: <54318F19.1090701@googlemail.com>
X-Archives-Salt: e0e7fafe-da84-4080-9093-c02f5fed07d7
X-Archives-Hash: 455142a390091283de25731115da460c
On 10/06/2014 05:34 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> Am 04.10.2014 um 19:37 schrieb Michael Palimaka:
>> On 10/04/2014 11:26 PM, behrouz khosravi wrote:
>>> Hello everyone.
>>> I was wondering if anyone has tried KDE5?
>>> Do you know when it's going to be placed in the main tree?
>>>
>>> thanks
>> Hi,
>>
>> The KDE release structure has evolved[1], decoupling the release cycle
>> of the Platform, Workspace, and Applications. This means that there is
>> no longer a single Software Compilation in the same way there was with
>> KDE 4.
>>
>> We (Gentoo KDE team) have not yet made a decision as to when the Plasma
>> 5 Workspace will be pushed to the main tree. I've been using it on a
>> daily basis for about six months, and consider the next release (5.1.0)
>> to be a good candidate for the main tree.
>>
>> The underlying Platform (KDE Frameworks 5) upon which Plasma 5 is built
>> is expected in the main tree in about a week, after the 5.3.0 release.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Michael
>>
>> [1]: https://dot.kde.org/2013/09/04/kde-release-structure-evolves
>>
>>
>>
>
> ok, at the moment you can't even install this mess:
>
> merge: there are no ebuilds built with USE flags to satisfy
> ">=dev-qt/qtwebkit-5.3.2:5[debug=,widgets]".
> !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request:
> - dev-qt/qtwebkit-5.3.2-r1::gentoo (Missing IUSE: widgets)
> (dependency required by "dev-qt/qtquick1-5.3.2" [ebuild])
> (dependency required by "kde-frameworks/plasma-5.2.0::kde" [ebuild])
> (dependency required by "@kde-frameworks-5.2" [argument])
>
> yepp, three ebuilds depending on qtwebkit with the widgets useflag -
> that it doesn't even have. Oh joy. And that after 2h+ dealing with other
> useflag related shenanigans.
>
> btw from the changelog:
>
> 25 Sep 2014; Michael Palimaka <kensington@gentoo.org> metadata.xml:
> Remove unused USE flag.
>
> that unused useflag wasn't 'widgets' by chance? ^^
>
>
>
Thanks for testing. It appears I missed a couple of consumers (I did
check!) and it's fixed now.
What other USE flag issues did you encounter?