From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5EA138206 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B68A2E088A; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26B80E083B for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1avoZz-0008P7-Ff for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:14:15 +0200 Received: from static-71-122-242-106.tampfl.fios.frontiernet.net ([static-71-122-242-106.tampfl.fios.frontiernet.net]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:14:15 +0200 Received: from wireless by static-71-122-242-106.tampfl.fios.frontiernet.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2016 18:14:15 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Anybody got a Gentoo system working under uclibc? Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:14:09 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20160427141253.GA834@waltdnes.org> <5720F615.2060901@charter.net> <20160427213140.GA2563@waltdnes.org> <57215994.5020807@charter.net> <20160428031648.GA5150@waltdnes.org> <5722110D.8070207@charter.net> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.122.242.106 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:43.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/43.0 SeaMonkey/2.40) X-Archives-Salt: 07cc32df-cc16-461c-b2a3-f756b62cddc9 X-Archives-Hash: 11e57975a371244c8150ca6b5abb5cea Corbin charter.net> writes: > If a hard dependency link between Xorg server -> xf86-input-keyboard > exists, this will never work. I have no idea at this point if this is > true. What I have been reading suggests that the xf86-input keyboard and > mouse libs are being phased out. > With that call ?error? ... Xorg may be an impossible goal / waste of > time on uClibc. Hmmmm. Anthony (Blueness@gentoo.org) is extraordinarily knowledgable with uclibc and related issues. So that is where I would seek clarity, advice and pathways for what you seek [1]. hth, James [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Hardened_uClibc