From: james <wireless@tampabay.rr.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: portage directory ownerships?
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:46:23 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20150916T145440-783@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20150916085740.0a7cb2a3@digimed.co.uk
Neil Bothwick <neil <at> digimed.co.uk> writes:
> > Here, all of /etc/portage is root:root
> > The tree and all overlays are portage:portage
> Just to add some confusion to the mix
<snip>
Good example and it got me thinking....
> So some are portage:portage, some are root:root - all use /var/portage
> for $PORTDIR so that's not an issue. One of the portage:portage ones is
> the one that syncs with the mirrors and acts as an rsync host for the
> others, this may or may not be significant.
I might swith to /var/portage on a new install. Whats the pedantic
reasons for for it? On an SSD for speed ? tmpdir? I'm curious, so tell me more.
1. So 'the tree' (/usr/portage/) is portage:portage OK.
2. and /etc/portages is root:root except for distfiles (root:portage) OK.
3. and /var/lib/layman and subdirs are root:root ???
Note, these are the overlays I use but do not hack on.
4. and /usr/local/portage is james:james
this where I hack on codes that are mostly other overlays that
need enhancements or raw codes I am processing into ebuilds.
5. /usr/local/experimental is james:james
where I working on codes that can compile
install or be removed without the baggage of portage/ebuilds. It
will be for embedded and cluster/cloud/vm movements of binaries
to attach directly to the 4.x kernel, dynamically.
I'm working on a new build semantic with DAGs, Tup, ninja and CheckInstall
So I can ignore (5) in make.conf. But I'm now getting ebuilds installed
in /usr/local/portage, I think because of this line in my make.conf::
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="source /etc/portage/repos.conf/layman.conf"
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage"
For goals of 1-5 what are improvements (any and all suggestions) on
make.conf I should make? I need to ensure that overlays that I do
not modify stay separate for the ebuild I modify. In fact some packages
are in both 3 and 4. I use git to seed category 4 so what caveates
do I use to ensure that git only seeds categroy 4 packages (ebuilds)once
and does not contaminant my 'old school; vim' hackery.
I think this is the only change I need::
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/usr/local/portage" ==>
PORTDIR_OVERLAY="/var/lib/layman"
Or does layman and git (syncs) know where to place things. I do use
'git clone' to seed category 4 packages-->ebuilds and will
eventually be use more of git's features to push out updates.
I just gotta get this straight, consistent and keep things seperate
in my mind, because being an old fart, reading lots of codes, sometimes
I forget the origins of hacks. (yea yea document the code you old hack)
All suggestions welcome.
TIA,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-16 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-15 20:09 [gentoo-user] portage directory ownerships? james
2015-09-15 20:23 ` wabenbau
2015-09-15 20:25 ` Alan McKinnon
2015-09-15 22:36 ` Fernando Rodriguez
2015-09-16 2:19 ` [gentoo-user] " james
2015-09-16 6:09 ` Alan McKinnon
2015-09-16 6:01 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2015-09-16 7:51 ` Fernando Rodriguez
2015-09-16 7:57 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-09-16 13:46 ` james [this message]
2015-09-16 14:19 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2015-09-16 14:51 ` Neil Bothwick
2015-09-17 5:38 ` Mick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20150916T145440-783@post.gmane.org \
--to=wireless@tampabay.rr.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox