From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C71213989D for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:21:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CD56E0880; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2515E0879 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:21:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUdRf-00025r-8m for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:21:03 +0200 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:21:03 +0200 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 18:21:03 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Grub1: Cant ? Re: keeping grub 1 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:20:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20150826152610.GA573@apio.adsroot.itcs.umich.edu> <20150826155920.GB573@apio.adsroot.itcs.umich.edu> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1) X-Archives-Salt: 18009a91-2151-4c9f-a5cd-baa9e29f1453 X-Archives-Hash: 7df22de76439259637f743ed947ad53d Alec Ten Harmsel alectenharmsel.com> writes: > I don't know anything about arm64, but if it is 64-bit, why would you > need 32-bit binaries? An enormous codebase that is not likely to get ported to 64 bit arm. Easy (embedded) product migration to arm64. also, arm64 supports big indian and little indian codes simultaneously. > I also am a bit of a purist, and just run no-multilib because it is > emotionally satisfying. Naw. Your teasing? (wink wink nudge nudge)..... > > OFF TOPIC > > On another note: have you seen spark-1.5 ? Cleaner build? > > http://apache-spark-developers-list.1001551.n3.nabble.com/Fwd-ANNOUNCE-Spark-1-5-0-preview-package-td13683.html > I haven't looked at the new features of 1.5 specifically, but I know > that the build process is basically the same. The API is nice, but it is > definitely possible to write a faster job using Hadoop's API since it is > lower-level and can be optimized more, so I spend more time writing jobs > using Hadoop's API. I've read that building spark-1.5 from sources is much cleaner now. bgo-523412. (your on the cc list?). Particularly parsing out hadoop support, for more focus regression testing on bare metal setups.... Drop me a line when you install 1.5 at work and how it runs with Hadoop. hth, James