From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-163886-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2547138CA2
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:37:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 90299E091C;
Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:37:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AAACE0914
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:37:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
id 1YkxeM-00032G-49
for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:37:23 +0200
Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:37:22 +0200
Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 22 Apr 2015 18:37:22 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: james <wireless@tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: gcc-5.0 ?
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2015 16:37:07 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <loom.20150422T182302-497@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20150421T152608-334@post.gmane.org> <20150421183919.1dc1c618@hactar.digimed.co.uk> <loom.20150421T201023-591@post.gmane.org> <mh88af$ll0$1@ger.gmane.org> <loom.20150422T165702-181@post.gmane.org> <mh8e4u$u3m$1@ger.gmane.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 SeaMonkey/2.33.1)
X-Archives-Salt: 4ac68c63-cd07-470f-a48f-890b3da6692d
X-Archives-Hash: c77b1bf0e93cfa0f901cdcc71de561a5
Nikos Chantziaras <realnc <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Lack of a version number always suggests latest "master" branch.
Good to know.
> However, these are Chromium OS overlays. I don't think you're supposed
> to be using them on Gentoo. They're for Chromium OS. For all you know,
> that live ebuild can refer to the master branch of Google's GCC branch,
> and it might not even build or work correctly as a Gentoo compiler.
Bummer. So why does it show up, when I run "eix -R -3 gcc" if
it's not gentoo eligible?
<snip>
(x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) 4.7.2-r51^ms[3] ~9999^ms[3]
[3] "chromiumos" layman/chromiumos
So is my best hope the "toolchain" repo ?
Do drop me a short message, if there is a live or 5.1 gcc somewhere.
I'm itching (really bad) to test RDMA on Cephfs with some in-memory
codes, on my gentoo_GPU_linux_cluster_hack.......
thx,
James