From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD39C1389E2 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 22:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44622E0982; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 22:10:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E22D9E091E for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 22:10:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25AA53405E0 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 22:10:46 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.337 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.337 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.625, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Dd8novfwTpZ for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 22:10:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BF1934058D for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2014 22:10:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XvZAr-0005L3-Gv for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 23:10:31 +0100 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 23:10:29 +0100 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 01 Dec 2014 23:10:29 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Custom ebuilds for CoreOS Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2014 22:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1) X-Archives-Salt: ca124aeb-fab4-434f-9235-b51513b7bd31 X-Archives-Hash: 2b8f02ebb6512a90d852e4ff80287c89 Rich Freeman gentoo.org> writes: > > To me, it appears that some forward looking folks have forked > > (stolen the best parts?) gentoo, made some fundamental > > (long overdue changes) and are > > all about creating a > > source_to_cluster platform. (hmmmm, vaguely sounds > > familiar...scratching head). It is a natural evilution for linux to > > take; or are we going to embrace some much needed change > > (new ideas) into gentoo? > I have no idea if CoreOS is Gentoo-derived, but it is very much a > special-purpose distro. The whole concept is that you put all the > value-add in the containers, and then you just want a really standard > and lightweight distro to host your containers in. Maybe you run > CentOS in one container, and Gentoo in another container, and Debian > in another container. Your first points are understood; and centos appear to be focused on the commercial "cloud" mentality of don't buy hareware, rent containers from us crowd. That, to me, is a fool's path. What I'm hoping for is that with the (gentoo) past of revolving devs, Hasufell ideas for distributed development by reducing the gentoo core; Flameyes takedown of tinderbox, my pursuit of clustering and many other issues (pid1) all seem to inidcate that many distros are fundamentally examining their path(s) forward. So, I think gentoo can have a minimize version that achieves what CoreOS is doing, but it is gentoo-bare-metal centric. I think Gentoo can robustly support systemd and openrc, containers and other key areas and new technologies, in a fundamentally unique way. I do think a fundamental "update" to the entire gentoo environment is a healthy ares for discussion. I do appreciate your insights on coreOS. I see it as a minimized embedded effort to bring resources into a cluster that is exclusively controlled by the owner. I have "zero" interest in the "cloud" as beside being a very dumb idea for too many reasons to innumerate, it removes folks from gaining knowledge of direct hardware experiences. I do love the way the "cloud" vendors find and collect up the very best ideas. I hate how the "cloud" vendors want to offer those best ideas, as a transient benefit via time-rented binaries. I strongly believe we are at a nexus (a vergence in the force) as many new technologies are converging very rapidly. Call it what you like, but, we are at the crossroads of some very unique opportunites, imho. If we had a gentoo cluster right now, something like tinderbox would have been running there all along. YMMV. James