From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5D701389E2 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:28:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 103B3E0914; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:28:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB265E087A for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:28:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF8B34016B for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:28:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.34 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.34 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.628, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y1iBGmYqrneq for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:27:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D4F3340042 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:27:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xv6Pi-0000Z2-1v for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:27:54 +0100 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:27:54 +0100 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2014 16:27:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Purpose of =?utf-8?b?YmFzaGNvbXBfYWxpYXM=?= in bash-completion-r1.eclass? Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 15:27:43 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <547B32B9.30507@floga.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1) X-Archives-Salt: 8ea13034-7192-466c-b230-62ff8331e682 X-Archives-Hash: f863e77636136698b567976aadb860d6 Florian Gamböck floga.de> writes: > Before reporting a bug I wanted to hear other opinions on that: In > bash-completion-r1.eclass, what is the true purpose of bashcomp_alias? There was a detailed discussion in gentoo-dev that is excellent reading on this issue: [gentoo-dev] [news item review] bash-completion-2.1-r90, version 2 circa 11/10/14. hth, James