From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4317138A1A for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D00D0E0AE8; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:09:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A83E3E0ADB for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:09:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F03834069B for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:09:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.354 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.354 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.642, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ik28LXvXb0Fq for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB576340688 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:09:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XpMFX-0008Sf-2a for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:09:39 +0100 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:09:39 +0100 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 20:09:39 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: qt5 Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 19:09:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <5465E394.2050002@uni-konstanz.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1) X-Archives-Salt: e254dc9c-f860-4fc3-8e4e-db656d355336 X-Archives-Hash: eaab252cd680812de19cb1a9bb2b5861 Michael Vetter uni-konstanz.de> writes: > Recently I started developing on LXQT. As they are using Qt5 on their > developing version I added Qt overlay and unmasked Qt5. BGO 525410 has some gentoo specific comments on lxqt-0.8.0 (qt5). I'm using slim as DM and openbox as WM right now. I got no problems with the clock, panel, vt switching and also no segfaults at configuring or such... Seems to be quite usable! File a gentoo bug, after you seek resolution at the lxde main site? >From what I've read, lxqt-0.8.0 is strictly qt5; some problems exist if trying to support both qt4 and qt5. But you need to check with folks running the latest codes for lxqt. [1] Last, I do not remember what is holding up the current masking of lxqt-0.8.0 but it could be related to your problem? good hunting! James [1] http://qt-project.org/wiki/Category:Tools::QtCreator#0bf259ca3118b8153806bc09bd6e84f3