From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 756B3138824 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:06:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61573E0849; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:06:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B2FCE0831 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:06:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA6234055A for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:06:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.997 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=1.034, BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.429, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LmroR-Hk29KM for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D31834057C for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:06:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xh2AT-00055b-Av for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:06:01 +0200 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:06:01 +0200 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2014 22:06:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] ceph on btrfs Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2014 20:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1) X-Archives-Salt: b50b5ea2-1345-4c79-ac76-6e873baf7c5e X-Archives-Hash: 344b757623372432acfcd7ff46c9f2da Hello, So looking at the package sys-cluster/ceph, I see these flags: cryptopp debug fuse gtk +libaio libatomic +nss radosgw static-libs tcmalloc xfs zfs No specific flags for btrfs? ceph-0.67.9 is marked stable, while 0.67.10 and 0.80.5 are marked (yellow) testing and *9999 is marked (red) masked. So what version would anyone recommend, with what flags? [1] Ceph will be the DFS on top of a (3) node mesos+spark cluster. btrfs is being set up with 2 disks in raid 1 on each system. Btrfs seems to be keenly compatible with ceph [2]. Guidance and comments, warmly requested, James [1] http://ceph.com/docs/v0.78/rados/configuration/filesystem-recommendations/ [2] http://ceph.com/docs/master/release-notes/#v0-80-firefly