From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FAD413838B for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 03C74E09BD; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:56:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECA0FE09AD for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E227234007C for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:56:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.317 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.317 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.663, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.652, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YFftjAzRQS-r for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF05334003D for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XU5Pu-0007zV-SQ for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:56:29 +0200 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:56:26 +0200 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 17 Sep 2014 04:56:26 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Ansible, puppet and chef Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2014 02:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <5418A0E6.4080204@gmail.com> <5418E422.9090108@alectenharmsel.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1) X-Archives-Salt: d1f1820b-a20c-47dd-8d67-754ece5a13f9 X-Archives-Hash: 7b1165c7b24409d0e89dccbe72a69863 Alec Ten Harmsel alectenharmsel.com> writes: > We use bcfg2, and all I can say is to stay away. XML abuse runs rampant > in bcfg2. From what I've heard from other professional sysadmins, Puppet > is the favorite, but that's mostly conjecture. Hi Alec! > > Anyone here used ansible > > What are your thoughts? I have no thoughts. I do see many, many new git repositories that contain mesos and ansible. [1] So ansible must be cool....? Ansible is everywhere now. Already given up on the local cron_extended effort? What, no Chronos? > > Anyone care to share experiences? Hey, I was drunk OK? I thought this clustering for science was a good thing, like getting a puppy and a new girlfriend all in the same week. BOY was I tricked. Anyway, I know deep down inside you are wanting a cluster where you work(?). Alec has one, I'm building one, so come in, the water is, well, very wet and wild! [1] https://github.com/AnsibleShipyard/ansible-mesos https://github.com/mhamrah/ansible-mesos-playbook http://blog.michaelhamrah.com/2014/06/setting-up-a-multi-node-mesos-cluster-running-docker-haproxy-and-marathon-with-ansible/ http://ops-school.readthedocs.org/en/latest/config_management.html many more..... James