From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-158542-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A87C13838B
for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:03:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C2A6E08F2;
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:03:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25DCEE0894
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:03:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F833401B7
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:03:20 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.594
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
tests=[AWL=0.607, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.499,
SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1])
by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 7MK1vb_nnObx for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:03:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3EB3C33FF5E
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:03:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
id 1XS4xj-0005th-Vg
for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:03:03 +0200
Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251])
by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:03:03 +0200
Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:03:03 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: post build files
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 14:02:54 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <loom.20140911T154441-534@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20140909T164818-641@post.gmane.org> <540F2977.2000508@alectenharmsel.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26.1)
X-Archives-Salt: a5dde263-f3a6-4998-8676-0e6b953ff2bd
X-Archives-Hash: 7bb0cb6bd26e4072de7b3467e8d7da89
Alec Ten Harmsel <alec <at> alectenharmsel.com> writes:
> Lastly, if you throw this in a publicly-accessible git repo I'll try and
> help, even though I took a look at mesos and it seems like it'll be hard
> because they bundle libraries with it and have made a couple other
> (imnho) bad decisions.
I biggest obstacle for all of the Apache clustering sofwares I want
to try, is java and other codes seem to be central to their
offerings.
For example "maven" is becoming critical for many codes [1].
In fact we are loosing jruby because nobody has the requisite
skills? [2].
Hacking and slashing through ebuilds is not difficult. I just
have inate tendencies to that cause me to believe the path
should be 'well worn" with ample examples; but alas I do not
think that is the gentoo way, particular with how fast things
are moving on new codes and the entire linux echo_systems.
Why not champion maven and jruby so many can benefit?
Can maven be built from sources, as I see it is currently
in binary form maven-bin ?
Maven is an obstacle that I'm not certain I can go around
if I am to continue down the apache cluster pathway......
<snip-dev>
# Mask jruby 1.6.x for removal in 30 days.
# on ruby 1.8. Many packages are no longer compatible with its
# syntax, and security support for ruby 1.8 has stopped. This
# incompatibility now has reached central packages like rubygems so we
# have decided to remove jruby 1.6 now. jruby upstream has released
# the 1.7.x series some time ago, but unfortunately we only have a
# masked version that has too many issues to unmask. Please let us
# know if you know java and ruby and want to help out here:
hth,
James
[1] http://maven.apache.org/
[2]
http://moving-innovations.com/blog/2014/04/23/the-precarious-state-of-jruby-in-gentoo