From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2FB13877A for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:23:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D89EBE09A8; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0B05E09A2 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5813400E4 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:23:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.063 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.063 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.051, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H9foN4y7vKwC for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:23:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47D1433FFD5 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:23:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WxLSK-0000Tg-Lk for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:23:37 +0200 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:23:36 +0200 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 21:23:36 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: yubikey Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 19:23:25 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <53A18447.2040702@xunil.at> <20140618194344.474aff2c@digimed.co.uk> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:29.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/29.0 SeaMonkey/2.26) X-Archives-Salt: c23ac41e-2b83-4ecd-9eac-dd38c8cd13eb X-Archives-Hash: d91c275a3faa6c7228d2f23f576a88ab Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:08:21 +0000 (UTC), James wrote: > > > > Anyone using that (with gentoo) ? > > > Experience? I consider getting one to test and use it .. > > > > > Stefan > > > > I do not know where to start, so I just try to simplify things > > Near Field Communications, are a very bad idea, if you care > > about security. (ybikey) is based on NFC. > > The Yubikey NEO uses NFC, the standard models do not use it. OK, lets skip any RF backdoors installed by the manufacturer, as those always exist, but are 'out of scope', for now. U see this? http://www.unrest.ca/evaluating-the-security-of-the-yubikey James