From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3241198003 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:49:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1BEA7E07A0; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:48:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8113E0795 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:48:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 999CB33DC62 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:48:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.679 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.679 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.050, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.627, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W8gKrFs6rGdF for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF58333DC39 for ; Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:48:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UCxrF-00026V-TU for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 20:49:06 +0100 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 20:49:05 +0100 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 20:49:05 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: wrong ram? Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 19:48:29 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <513631B8.6070009@googlemail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14) X-Archives-Salt: 05b969da-2725-4be4-9593-60ef5ef076aa X-Archives-Hash: 89abc9d8e7b41b09bdd3a397bfbea090 Volker Armin Hemmann googlemail.com> writes: > intel introduced an extension for spd information. The ram should work > just fine. Intel motherboards might or might not make use of the > additional information. so might or might not amd boards. And no, there > won't be any risk. DDR3 is DDR3. Nice to know about adjusting the timings/voltages. Any suggested further docs or resources on this is of keen interest to me. Maybe an example? I never had to adjust timings/voltages before. Then again, I need to poke around the Gigabyte BIOS as these are my first Gigabyte mobos. Very advance Thanks to all responders. I'll give it a go and post back if there is any further issues. James