From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79471138298 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:56:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D900421C028; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:56:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 666F221C00D for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:54:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8062C33C3B4 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:54:53 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.447 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.447 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.435, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AoXS4uVXmrfN for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:54:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 666FF33D92A for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:54:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TqxQv-0002Yp-Kc for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 03:54:57 +0100 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 03:54:57 +0100 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 03:54:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: udev downgrade Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 02:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/17.0 SeaMonkey/2.14.1) X-Archives-Salt: f5c0ef23-6225-419a-9a76-ae1178fdf541 X-Archives-Hash: c252630f5e353e3438cd0ea4e9d73b10 James tampabay.rr.com> writes: > So unless somebody can give me good reason, I'm downgrading to > udev-171 asap on this (only) system running udev 196....... > (ps, I like to experiment, but not with udev et. al.) Long night, when you have to answer your own posts..... Now I get: emerge -p1u udev These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild UD ] sys-fs/udev-171-r9 [196-r1] USE="rule_generator%* -action_modeswitch% -build% -debug% -edd% (-extras) -floppy% {-test%}" [blocks B ] =sys-fs/udev-196-r1[gudev?,hwdb?,introspection?,keymap?,selinux?,static-libs?] required by (virtual/udev-196::gentoo, installed) (sys-fs/udev-171-r9::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in this slot) ideas? James