From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gentoo-user+bounces-142440-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>
Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80])
	by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7951381F3
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 Nov 2012 19:52:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D0B5E068F;
	Fri,  9 Nov 2012 19:51:56 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33029E05A1
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 Nov 2012 19:50:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C8D533D7CC
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 Nov 2012 19:50:13 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5
	tests=[AWL=-1.330, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.369, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001,
	SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [IPv6:::ffff:127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id ixK9V9LwOVuw for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
	Fri,  9 Nov 2012 19:50:07 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0860B33D7C8
	for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri,  9 Nov 2012 19:50:04 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <lnx-gentoo-user@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1TWuad-0001W2-Pq
	for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:50:07 +0100
Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251])
        by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:50:07 +0100
Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
        id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
        for <gentoo-user@gentoo.org>; Fri, 09 Nov 2012 20:50:07 +0100
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
From: James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com>
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: OT: new system hardware
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 19:49:46 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <loom.20121109T204540-801@post.gmane.org>
References: <loom.20121109T195347-159@post.gmane.org> <CAPBmLJaoLHL2inOBN+9Et3F-3xO0sfzY1ZAgxvWPbqtc9fr1dA@mail.gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org
User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)
X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120910 Firefox/15.0.1 SeaMonkey/2.12.1)
X-Archives-Salt: 07d3fb28-f82b-4363-92d8-787f0ed8180e
X-Archives-Hash: 6d2f34016187825156cb52467fe1d862

Andrew Hoffman <sixgod <at> gmail.com> writes:


> cpu cooler:

>
http://hardocp.com/article/2012/11/06/thermalright_true_spirit_120m_cpu_air_cooler_review

> Big, quiet very good performance. I own this and love it
>
http://hardocp.com/article/2011/07/26/thermalright_hr02_macho_cpu_air_cooler_review/
> -AndyOn Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 1:00 PM, James <wireless <at> tampabay.rr.com> 

Any ides on the dB (noise) rating?
I like my machines on the low dB side....

I did not see dB ratings after looking at both,
but, could have easily missed them.

passive  or a slow speed (low dB fan)
 on a water cooler would be keen?
affordable?
Necessary?


James