From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SiuxJ-0006D5-QK for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:06:55 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 845A6E0978; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DCAE094F for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 363EC1B437D for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:05:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.577 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.577 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.666, BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_RCVD_USER=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J3Y82RmU4aKM for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AB151B423A for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:05:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SiuvV-00026x-VJ for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:05:02 +0200 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:05:01 +0200 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:05:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: eselect binutils list not matching Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 22:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120602 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9.1) X-Archives-Salt: 7c7aa1c5-7711-4362-a506-2790d35ab00f X-Archives-Hash: ff94d0ae40ceda7fa38df7a9e3e3a9ae Mark Knecht gmail.com> writes: > One of my machines is giving an undesired response in eselect: > > c2stable ~ # eselect binutils list > !!! Error: Pattern does not match any installed version of binutils! > exiting > c2stable ~ # > > All other machiness do something akin to: > > k2 ~ # eselect binutils list > Installed binutils for target x86_64-pc-linux-gnu > [1] 2.21.1 * > k2 ~ # I checked one of mine: # eselect binutils list Installed binutils for target x86_64-pc-linux-gnu I have this version installed: Installed versions: 2.21.1-r1 so maybe just rebuild binutils and see what happens? or rebuild what ever it depends on? Just quick guesses.... hth, James