From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SQhto-00020y-PW for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 16:32:01 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00F2BE0941; Sat, 5 May 2012 16:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B515BE08A5 for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 16:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483741B4033 for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 16:30:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.687, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gq05Fd9xDR2X for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 16:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5F891B401A for ; Sat, 5 May 2012 16:30:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SQhrt-0006ln-JG for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 18:30:01 +0200 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 May 2012 18:30:01 +0200 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 May 2012 18:30:01 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: minimal web server Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 16:29:47 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20120505130400.1d7272a1@khamul.example.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120402 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8) X-Archives-Salt: 9b2b1185-f593-4173-843b-c4aaf2bc1d88 X-Archives-Hash: 3e8bf4bfe4b8cc74510a3bd87aeb35cb Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes: > > #copy running-config [http | https] > How many routers are you backing up and what are your needs? It varies. I seem to 'inherit' networks that are not populated by humans (mostly machines & controls). I like to first copy the running configurations to my laptop as often the routers are old and nobody seems to know much about them. (yea as an old linux_hag I get work on stuff that most other will not touch)..... As a PE in Controls, I seem to get lucky and am able to patch, enhance or replace equipment, with minimal disturbances to the myriad of protocols and legacy heuristics that inhabit these plants. It's a situation where if you break it, you own the problem. I try very hard to keep Microsoft based technologies out of the plants. Microsoft(anything) is mostly a disaster in the Process Controls space. I often prove this to a customer, by dropping in a sniffer here and there and show them the myriad of shit_traffic that Microsoft(anything) generates just to move a few bits around. Besides, if you don't believe me, just ask the IRANIANS how wonderful MS is (think stuxnet virus). (enough background?) I use a laptop, as often the sites do not have any remote access or it is blocked. I grab a config and then figure out a fix, only to return later, sometimes with drop in replacement hardware. Too often, I'm content to just hack at the old existing (shit) hardware. Industrial folks are not so robust on their nets that control machines and such.Often, Poor practices and little of a structured management system exist. Still, I get to avoid humans, so I trudge along, meeking out a living.... > https://www.shrubbery.net/rancid Rancid looks interesting enough to explore. Do you have an unofficial ebuild somewhere, or do you just hack the install on gentoo? James