From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1SPDHB-00058W-Iu for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 13:37:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B2A2FE0798; Tue, 1 May 2012 13:37:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CF56E0730 for ; Tue, 1 May 2012 13:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86B871B4069 for ; Tue, 1 May 2012 13:36:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.603 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.603 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.691, BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xqIzfOZhmdbF for ; Tue, 1 May 2012 13:36:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C73521B4066 for ; Tue, 1 May 2012 13:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SPDFK-0004Iv-DD for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 01 May 2012 15:36:02 +0200 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 May 2012 15:36:02 +0200 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 01 May 2012 15:36:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: fetch restriction bypass Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 13:35:54 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <4F9EDBCE.3020808@orlitzky.com> <4F9F3EFA.1010001@orlitzky.com> <4F9F4189.50309@orlitzky.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120402 Firefox/11.0 SeaMonkey/2.8) X-Archives-Salt: 67a7bcd1-17a6-47ae-9955-8ac61b457c8a X-Archives-Hash: 0bc0e9553d03fe2bdc7f6475ce5d9597 Michael Orlitzky orlitzky.com> writes: > On 04/30/2012 09:40 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > And, the cookies don't get set in a normal HTTP request. > For this to make sense, you probably want to read, "HTML request." Ok, I've got to think about all of this feedback and figure out what to do. I'm leaning towards manual download, once, and then an automation script that runs each time I do an update. That script would check for Fetch restricted packages on each machine locally, as there cannot be too many that I use, and then download the latest version via scp from a (suggested) previous download. Maybe this is a chance to play with port-knocking before allowing the local file transfer.... I gotta think about how I want to do this. My network is "hard partition" internally, as portions move to different locations and must be "stand alone" no matter how the partitions are split. For now, the partitions do not morph (change in component count). ** note** a partition does not reference a hard drive scheme but the fact that security and feature enhancements are achieved by physical and/or software isolation. Each partition should be fully functional and survivable from frequent physical separation. Each partition can contain one or more computational/storage resources and are not similar in component count. thanks for all the responses, James