From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Rzseu-0002of-6f for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:33:44 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFD05E13C1; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:33:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7C4E1229 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B931F1B4023 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:32:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.667 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-0.756, BAYES_00=-1.9, FSL_RCVD_USER=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PxObDaZEOU42 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF8501B401B for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:32:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RzsdO-00012V-2z for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:32:10 +0100 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:32:10 +0100 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:32:10 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: A systemd-only Gentoo system Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:32:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120213 Firefox/10.0 SeaMonkey/2.7) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 740a834e-a2fb-447e-820e-d7f2684295e9 X-Archives-Hash: a842ba84b32a358062b6cf9015080bea Canek Pel=C3=A1ez Vald=C3=A9s gmail.com> writes: > Hi; I've been running systemd in Gentoo since September from 2010, and > it works great for me: all my machines run it at this point. Well, I'm curious. How well does systemd work with uClibc based systems? More=20 specifically does systemd work well with embedded linux systems? How does systemd work with a system that uses SElinux? How well does a group of (systemd) systems work with a wide deployment of a distributed file system, such as BTRFS? Just curious if you know about any of these areas related to systemd. James