* [gentoo-user] Which network monitoring?
@ 2011-04-04 2:10 Pandu Poluan
2011-04-04 3:23 ` kashani
2011-04-04 13:44 ` [gentoo-user] " James
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pandu Poluan @ 2011-04-04 2:10 UTC (permalink / raw
To: Gentoo-user
Hello users!
I am transitioning my infrastructure back-ends from Windows to Gentoo
Linux. The next server to be transitioned is our infrastructure
monitoring server.
Currently, we're using WebWatchBot. Its abilities that we use are:
- Monitoring Internet connection up/down (we have 4 Internet connections)
- Monitoring website (which we host on a 3rd party webhosting) by
searching for a keyword using HTTP
- Monitoring free space on other servers (mostly Windows-based, thuse
we use WMI)
- Monitoring services on Windows-based servers (again, WMI)
- Sending alerts to selected groups (PICs) when failure exceeds a
threshold (e.g., Systems group will receive alerts for their database
servers, Infrastructure group will receive all alerts)
Can you recommend a suitable monitoring system for Gentoo?
Thanks beforehand.
Rgds,
--
--
Pandu E Poluan - IT Optimizer
My website: http://pandu.poluan.info/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Which network monitoring?
2011-04-04 2:10 [gentoo-user] Which network monitoring? Pandu Poluan
@ 2011-04-04 3:23 ` kashani
2011-04-04 13:44 ` [gentoo-user] " James
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kashani @ 2011-04-04 3:23 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 4/3/2011 7:10 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
> Hello users!
>
> I am transitioning my infrastructure back-ends from Windows to Gentoo
> Linux. The next server to be transitioned is our infrastructure
> monitoring server.
>
> Currently, we're using WebWatchBot. Its abilities that we use are:
> - Monitoring Internet connection up/down (we have 4 Internet connections)
> - Monitoring website (which we host on a 3rd party webhosting) by
> searching for a keyword using HTTP
> - Monitoring free space on other servers (mostly Windows-based, thuse
> we use WMI)
> - Monitoring services on Windows-based servers (again, WMI)
> - Sending alerts to selected groups (PICs) when failure exceeds a
> threshold (e.g., Systems group will receive alerts for their database
> servers, Infrastructure group will receive all alerts)
>
> Can you recommend a suitable monitoring system for Gentoo?
Nagios still works well for me. And it'll do some wmi stuff, IIRC. I've
been using a combination of Mysql backed Puppet with stored resources
for system management. Then push Nagios configs to the Nagios server via
tags in Puppet. Still working to get it right, but it's about there.
Next step is to get collectd working with Nagios as well.
kashani
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: Which network monitoring?
2011-04-04 2:10 [gentoo-user] Which network monitoring? Pandu Poluan
2011-04-04 3:23 ` kashani
@ 2011-04-04 13:44 ` James
2011-04-04 21:30 ` Mick
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: James @ 2011-04-04 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Pandu Poluan <pandu <at> poluan.info> writes:
> Can you recommend a suitable monitoring system for Gentoo?
www.JFFNMS.org
"Being written in PHP, JFFNMS can be customized to suit
different pieces of equipment. Basically if the device
has something interesting to monitor via SNMP either a
state (up/down) or a value, JFFNMS can be made to monitor it."
It's very flexible and lightweight. Under fresh new development.
Really cool for SNMP, routers, managed switches, servers
ups, and "unique" devices. etc etc. Syslog monitoring too.
Easy to extend to new or unique devices (php).
There should be an updated ebuild coming out any day
(thanks titan9fold)!
Postgresql 9 support real soon....
hth,
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which network monitoring?
2011-04-04 13:44 ` [gentoo-user] " James
@ 2011-04-04 21:30 ` Mick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mick @ 2011-04-04 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1155 bytes --]
On Monday 04 April 2011 14:44:37 James wrote:
> Pandu Poluan <pandu <at> poluan.info> writes:
> > Can you recommend a suitable monitoring system for Gentoo?
>
> www.JFFNMS.org
>
> "Being written in PHP, JFFNMS can be customized to suit
> different pieces of equipment. Basically if the device
> has something interesting to monitor via SNMP either a
> state (up/down) or a value, JFFNMS can be made to monitor it."
>
> It's very flexible and lightweight. Under fresh new development.
> Really cool for SNMP, routers, managed switches, servers
> ups, and "unique" devices. etc etc. Syslog monitoring too.
> Easy to extend to new or unique devices (php).
>
> There should be an updated ebuild coming out any day
> (thanks titan9fold)!
>
> Postgresql 9 support real soon....
>
>
> hth,
> James
Personally, I opted for Nagios because back then there weren't (m)any other
applications with such a high number of plugins that could monitor as much as
Nagios does. These days there more options to investigate and find what suits
you best:
http://www.learncomputer.com/open-source-network-tools/
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-04-04 21:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-04 2:10 [gentoo-user] Which network monitoring? Pandu Poluan
2011-04-04 3:23 ` kashani
2011-04-04 13:44 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2011-04-04 21:30 ` Mick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox