From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0Fip-0008Jy-01 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:06:47 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C85CE0024; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C71F9E0024 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562481B40C0 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:05:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.538 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.538 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sZ+KHmRlfiOj for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:05:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27941B408A for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:05:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0FhJ-0000SC-GY for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:05:13 +0100 Received: from rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com ([71.40.157.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:05:13 +0100 Received: from wireless by rrcs-71-40-157-251.se.biz.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:05:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo Live 11.0 Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <20110315154021.670c13ae@digimed.co.uk> <20110316233644.GA26551@waltdnes.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 71.40.157.251 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.17) Gecko/20110311 Gentoo/2.0.12 SeaMonkey/2.0.12) X-Archives-Salt: X-Archives-Hash: bf59329d45604b88f88e5daa2ed3e02f Walter Dnes waltdnes.org> writes: > WINE, which runs some Windows apps, will not build on a 64-bit system > without multilib support. I found that out "the hard way" after > installing pure 64-bit on my machine. Rather than wipe+reinstall, I > ended up installing a 32-bit Gentoo guest under qemu-kvm, and installed > WINE on that. Walter, You have confused me. First you indicate that multilib is needed for WINE. Then you indicate that you had to use the 32 bit mixed mode (no multilib).... under qemu-kvm, and and then install WINE under the 32 bit qemu. So if you were installing a system, just to run wine, would it be multilib or hybrid (64 and 32 bit) ? James