[gentoo-user] Java jdk

[gentoo-user] Java jdk

[James]

Hello,

So following this doc:
2009-04-18-java-config-wrapper-0.16

I ran: java-check-environment

then: rm /etc/env.d/20java ;  env-update && source /etc/profile

and finally: emerge -av --depclean dev-java/java-config:0 

Calculating dependencies... done!
  virtual/jdk-1.4.2 pulled in by:
    dev-db/hsqldb-1.8.0.10
    dev-java/jdbc-mysql-5.0.8
    dev-java/jdbc-postgresql-8.3_p603-r1
    dev-util/eclipse-sdk-3.2.1-r3

   No packages selected for removal by depclean
Packages installed:   1118
Packages in world:    95
Packages in system:   51
Required packages:    1118
Number removed:       0


So it looks like I need this virtual/jdk-1.4.2 ???

but my choices are: # eselect java-vm list
Available Java Virtual Machines:
  [1]   blackdown-jdk-1.4.2
  [2]   sun-jdk-1.6  system-vm

So I ran these:

equery depends hsqldb
app-office/openoffice-3.1.0-r1 (java? >=dev-db/hsqldb-1.8.0.9)
 
emerge -1D hsqldb
python-updater
env-update && source /etc/profile 
emerge @preserved-rebuild
revdep-rebuild -p ; revdep-rebuild

Still OpenOffice is broken per thread
openoffice fails on qt_plugins_3.3rc


The error I still get when I launch OO is:
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'

and so I'm not sure I have java setup correctly.

The system has been synced and updated as of today.

thoughts and ideas most welcome?


james

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[walt]

On 08/02/2009 12:42 PM, James wrote:

> Calculating dependencies... done!
>    virtual/jdk-1.4.2 pulled in by:
>      dev-db/hsqldb-1.8.0.10
>      dev-java/jdbc-mysql-5.0.8
>      dev-java/jdbc-postgresql-8.3_p603-r1
>      dev-util/eclipse-sdk-3.2.1-r3
>
>
> So it looks like I need this virtual/jdk-1.4.2 ???
>
> but my choices are: # eselect java-vm list
> Available Java Virtual Machines:
>    [1]   blackdown-jdk-1.4.2
>    [2]   sun-jdk-1.6  system-vm

IMO unless you're doing some really unusual/obscure java thing,
you don't want or need the blacktown-jdk.  I'm guessing that if
you delete that and run revdep-rebuild you'll probably see those
other packages get rebuilt against the sun-jdk-1.6 and that will
get rid of the virtual jdk-1.4.2 for you.

But I'm not putting any money on it ;)

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[James]

walt <w41ter <at> gmail.com> writes:


> IMO unless you're doing some really unusual/obscure java thing,
> you don't want or need the blacktown-jdk.  I'm guessing that if
> you delete that and run revdep-rebuild you'll probably see those
> other packages get rebuilt against the sun-jdk-1.6 and that will
> get rid of the virtual jdk-1.4.2 for you.


OK 
did that.

java-check-environment
<snip>  
Java environment is sane. Congratulations!

eselect java-vm list
Available Java Virtual Machines:
  [1]   sun-jdk-1.6  system-vm

But look here:

eix virtual/jdk
[I] virtual/jdk
     Available versions:
        (1.4)   1.4.1 1.4.2
        (1.5)   1.5.0
        (1.6)   1.6.0
     Installed versions:  1.4.2(1.4)(14:13:11 07/07/09) 1.6.0(1.6)(14:10:01
07/07/09)
     Homepage:            http://java.sun.com/
     Description:         Virtual for JDK



ooffice runs as root, but faults as any normal
user on the system:

terminate called after throwing an instance of
'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'


Any other ideas?


James

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[Dale]

James wrote:
> walt <w41ter <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>   
>> IMO unless you're doing some really unusual/obscure java thing,
>> you don't want or need the blacktown-jdk.  I'm guessing that if
>> you delete that and run revdep-rebuild you'll probably see those
>> other packages get rebuilt against the sun-jdk-1.6 and that will
>> get rid of the virtual jdk-1.4.2 for you.
>>     
>
>
> OK 
> did that.
>
> java-check-environment
> <snip>  
> Java environment is sane. Congratulations!
>
> eselect java-vm list
> Available Java Virtual Machines:
>   [1]   sun-jdk-1.6  system-vm
>
> But look here:
>
> eix virtual/jdk
> [I] virtual/jdk
>      Available versions:
>         (1.4)   1.4.1 1.4.2
>         (1.5)   1.5.0
>         (1.6)   1.6.0
>      Installed versions:  1.4.2(1.4)(14:13:11 07/07/09) 1.6.0(1.6)(14:10:01
> 07/07/09)
>      Homepage:            http://java.sun.com/
>      Description:         Virtual for JDK
>
>
>
> ooffice runs as root, but faults as any normal
> user on the system:
>
> terminate called after throwing an instance of
> 'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'
>
>
> Any other ideas?
>
>
> James
>
>
>   

Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
issue.  You running something special on your system?  Hardened or
something more "secure"?

Dale

:-)  :-) 

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[James]

Dale <rdalek1967 <at> gmail.com> writes:


> Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
> issue.  You running something special on your system?  Hardened or
> something more "secure"?


Nope,

It's been a normal (stable) gentoo workstation
with OO for a couple of years.  KDE4 and X
started this spiral downward, methinks.....


 in /usr/bin  we see


-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   76 Aug  2 14:34 oobase
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   76 Aug  2 14:34 oocalc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 8.2K Aug  2 14:34 ooconfig
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   76 Aug  2 14:34 oodraw
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   71 Aug  2 14:34 ooffice
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   80 Aug  2 14:34 oofromtemplate
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   79 Aug  2 14:34 ooimpress
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   76 Aug  2 14:34 oomath
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.0K Aug  2 14:34 ootool
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   75 Aug  2 14:34 ooweb
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   78 Aug  2 14:34 oowriter


It starts up and throws that java runtime exception....
I thought rebuilding dev-db/hsqldb might
help, but no......

Google for days now produces nothing....

???


James

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[Mike Kazantsev]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 796 bytes --]

On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 23:45:16 +0000 (UTC)
James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> Dale <rdalek1967 <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> 
> > Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
> > issue.  You running something special on your system?  Hardened or
> > something more "secure"?
> 
> 
> Nope,
> 
> It's been a normal (stable) gentoo workstation
> with OO for a couple of years.  KDE4 and X
> started this spiral downward, methinks.....

Prehaps you can run it via strace to see which ops (on which files) give
it permission errors just before crash?

  emerge -1 dev-util/strace && strace -f ooffice 2>strace.log
  grep -2 -e EACCES -e EPERM strace.log
  tail -500 strace.log | less (to see what happened last)

-- 
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[James]

Mike Kazantsev <mk.fraggod <at> gmail.com> writes:


>   emerge -1 dev-util/strace && strace -f ooffice 2>strace.log
>   grep -2 -e EACCES -e EPERM strace.log
>   tail -500 strace.log | less (to see what happened last)



OK,  Here are the bottom lines:



[pid 28034]
stat("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/uno_packages/cache/
registry/com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.
PackageRegistryBackend/registry/data/org/openoffice/Office/Common.xcu",
0x7fff6244c020) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
[pid 28034] lseek(26, 4300, SEEK_SET)   = 4300
[pid 28034] lseek(26, 0, SEEK_CUR)      = 4300
--
[pid 28034]
access("/usr/lib64/openoffice/share/registry/modules/org/openoffice/Setup",
F_OK) = 0
[pid 28034]
lstat("/usr/lib64/openoffice/share/registry/modules/org/openoffice/Setup",
{st_mode=S_IFDIR|0755, st_size=80, ...}) = 0
[pid 28034]
access("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/uno_packages/cache/registry/
com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/registry/
data/org/openoffice",
F_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
[pid 28034]
access("/home/james/.ooo3/user/uno_packages/cache/registry/
com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/
registry/data/org/openoffice",
F_OK) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
[pid 28034] access("/home/james/.ooo3/user/registry/data/org/openoffice",
 F_OK)
= -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
--
[pid 28034] fcntl(27, F_SETLK, {type=F_UNLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=0,
 len=0}) = 0
[pid 28034] close(27)                   = 0
[pid 28034]
stat("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/uno_packages/cache/registry/
com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/
registry/data/org/openoffice/Setup.xcu",
0x7fff6244bd80) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
[pid 28034]
open("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/libexlinkli.so",
O_RDONLY) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
[pid 28034]
open("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../basis-link/program/libpackage2.so",
O_RDONLY) = 27
james@sliver ~ $ tail -500 strace.log | less
james@sliver ~ $ tail -f strace.log
Process 28003 detached
<... wait4 resumed> [{WIFEXITED(s) && WEXITSTATUS(s) == 0}], 0, NULL) = 28003
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
--- SIGCHLD (Child exited) @ 0 (0) ---
wait4(-1, 0x7fffde7b2ce4, WNOHANG, NULL) = -1 ECHILD (No child processes)
rt_sigreturn(0xffffffffffffffff)        = 0
rt_sigaction(SIGINT, {SIG_DFL, [], SA_RESTORER, 0x7f72d5e20270}, {0x438d90, [],
SA_RESTORER, 0x7f72d5e20270}, 8) = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, NULL, [], 8)  = 0
read(255, ""..., 71)                    = 0
exit_group(0)                           = ?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[Mike Kazantsev]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1104 bytes --]

On Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:38:32 +0000 (UTC)
James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com> wrote:

> Mike Kazantsev <mk.fraggod <at> gmail.com> writes:
> 
> 
> >   emerge -1 dev-util/strace && strace -f ooffice 2>strace.log
> >   grep -2 -e EACCES -e EPERM strace.log
> >   tail -500 strace.log | less (to see what happened last)
> 
> 
> 
> OK,  Here are the bottom lines:

...

> access("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/uno_packages/cache/registry/
> com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/registry/
> data/org/openoffice",
> F_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)

Why is that?


> stat("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/uno_packages/cache/registry/
> com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/
> registry/data/org/openoffice/Setup.xcu",
> 0x7fff6244bd80) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)

...same file again and (shortly) a crash.


Prehaps you should check if it has some 0600 or 0640 mode and correct
it to 644. Prehaps it's one of the parent dirs, just try to stat it as a
user.


-- 
Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[James]

Mike Kazantsev <mk.fraggod <at> gmail.com> writes:


> > access("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/uno_packages/cache/registry/
> > com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/registry/
> > data/org/openoffice",
> > F_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)

> Why is that?


Good question, dunno....


> > stat("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/uno_packages/cache/registry/
> > com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/
> > registry/data/org/openoffice/Setup.xcu",
> > 0x7fff6244bd80) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)

> ...same file again and (shortly) a crash.

> Prehaps you should check if it has some 0600 or 0640 mode and correct
> it to 644. Prehaps it's one of the parent dirs, just try to stat it as a
> user.


Well here's what I found:

# ls -alg /usr/lib64/openoffice/share/uno_packages/cache
total 13
drwxr-xr-x 4 root   168 Aug  2 16:34 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 root    72 Mar 26 02:33 ..
drwx------ 8 root   520 Jul 17 08:13 registry
-rw------- 1 root     1 Aug  2 16:34 stamp.sys
drwx------ 2 root    48 Jul 17 08:13 uno_packages
-rw------- 1 root 12288 Jul 17 08:13 uno_packages.db


so from that cache dir
chmod -R 755 *

fix it!

Thanks,


James

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[Dale]

James wrote:
> Mike Kazantsev <mk.fraggod <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>   
>>> access("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/uno_packages/cache/registry/
>>> com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/registry/
>>> data/org/openoffice",
>>> F_OK) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
>>>       
>
>   
>> Why is that?
>>     
>
>
> Good question, dunno....
>
>
>   
>>> stat("/usr/lib64/openoffice/program/../share/uno_packages/cache/registry/
>>> com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend/
>>> registry/data/org/openoffice/Setup.xcu",
>>> 0x7fff6244bd80) = -1 EACCES (Permission denied)
>>>       
>
>   
>> ...same file again and (shortly) a crash.
>>     
>
>   
>> Prehaps you should check if it has some 0600 or 0640 mode and correct
>> it to 644. Prehaps it's one of the parent dirs, just try to stat it as a
>> user.
>>     
>
>
> Well here's what I found:
>
> # ls -alg /usr/lib64/openoffice/share/uno_packages/cache
> total 13
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root   168 Aug  2 16:34 .
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root    72 Mar 26 02:33 ..
> drwx------ 8 root   520 Jul 17 08:13 registry
> -rw------- 1 root     1 Aug  2 16:34 stamp.sys
> drwx------ 2 root    48 Jul 17 08:13 uno_packages
> -rw------- 1 root 12288 Jul 17 08:13 uno_packages.db
>
>
> so from that cache dir
> chmod -R 755 *
>
> fix it!
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> James
>
>
>   

So it was a permissions issue.  I suspected that.  If you didn't change
that, you may want to file a bug so it can be fixed.

Dale

:-)  :-) 

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[walt]

On 08/03/2009 06:54 AM, James wrote:

> Well here's what I found:
>
> # ls -alg /usr/lib64/openoffice/share/uno_packages/cache
> total 13
> drwxr-xr-x 4 root   168 Aug  2 16:34 .
> drwxr-xr-x 3 root    72 Mar 26 02:33 ..
> drwx------ 8 root   520 Jul 17 08:13 registry
> -rw------- 1 root     1 Aug  2 16:34 stamp.sys
> drwx------ 2 root    48 Jul 17 08:13 uno_packages
> -rw------- 1 root 12288 Jul 17 08:13 uno_packages.db
>
>
> so from that cache dir
> chmod -R 755 *
>
> fix it!

Hmm. Both my x86 machine and my ~amd64 machine have *nothing* in that
directory.  All of those files and directories are in my ~/.ooo3 instead.

And /root doesn't even have a .ooo3 directory.

Beats me :-/

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[James]

walt <w41ter <at> gmail.com> writes:



> > # ls -alg /usr/lib64/openoffice/share/uno_packages/cache

> Hmm. Both my x86 machine and my ~amd64 machine have *nothing* in that
> directory.  All of those files and directories are in my ~/.ooo3 instead.


That's certainly not consistent?

Here's the files under my (user) .ooo3 dir:
~/.ooo3/user/registry/cache

org.openoffice.LDAP.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Accelerators.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Addons.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Calc.dat
org.openoffice.Office.CalcAddIns.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Commands.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Common.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Compatibility.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Events.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Histories.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Impress.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Jobs.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Linguistic.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Logging.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Paths.dat
org.openoffice.Office.ProtocolHandler.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Recovery.dat
org.openoffice.Office.SFX.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Substitution.dat
org.openoffice.Office.TabBrowse.dat
org.openoffice.Office.TypeDetection.dat
org.openoffice.Office.UI.CalcCommands.dat
org.openoffice.Office.UI.CalcWindowState.dat
org.openoffice.Office.UI.Controller.dat
org.openoffice.Office.UI.Factories.dat
org.openoffice.Office.UI.GenericCommands.dat
org.openoffice.Office.UI.GlobalSettings.dat
org.openoffice.Office.UI.WriterCommands.dat
org.openoffice.Office.UI.WriterWindowState.dat
org.openoffice.Office.UI.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Views.dat
org.openoffice.Office.Writer.dat
org.openoffice.Office.WriterWeb.dat
org.openoffice.Setup.dat
org.openoffice.System.dat
org.openoffice.TypeDetection.Filter.dat
org.openoffice.TypeDetection.Misc.dat
org.openoffice.TypeDetection.Types.dat
org.openoffice.UserProfile.dat
org.openoffice.VCL.dat
org.openoffice.ucb.Configuration.dat
org.openoffice.ucb.Store.dat


Not the same. Nor are the files under the 
/usr/lib64/openoffice/share/uno_packages/cache/registry
found under my .ooo3 dir.



> And /root doesn't even have a .ooo3 directory.

Nor does my root dir contain the .ooo3 dir.



Anyway, I'm done.
thanks for the help.


James

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[walt]

On 08/03/2009 08:25 AM, James wrote:
> walt<w41ter<at>  gmail.com>  writes:
>
>
>
>>> # ls -alg /usr/lib64/openoffice/share/uno_packages/cache
>
>> Hmm. Both my x86 machine and my ~amd64 machine have *nothing* in that
>> directory.  All of those files and directories are in my ~/.ooo3 instead.
>
>
> That's certainly not consistent?
>
> Here's the files under my (user) .ooo3 dir:
> ~/.ooo3/user/registry/cache...

Sorry, I meant this directory:

$l .ooo3/user/uno_packages/cache/
-rw-r--r-- 1 wa1ter users  9511 2009-08-02 09:29 log.txt
drwxr-xr-x 8 wa1ter users  4096 2008-10-19 18:13 registry/
-rw-r--r-- 1 wa1ter users     1 2009-08-02 09:29 stamp.sys
drwxr-xr-x 3 wa1ter users  4096 2008-12-07 15:30 uno_packages/
-rw-r--r-- 1 wa1ter users 12288 2008-12-07 15:30 uno_packages.db

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[James]

walt <w41ter <at> gmail.com> writes:

> $l .ooo3/user/uno_packages/cache/
> -rw-r--r-- 1 wa1ter users  9511 2009-08-02 09:29 log.txt
> drwxr-xr-x 8 wa1ter users  4096 2008-10-19 18:13 registry/
> -rw-r--r-- 1 wa1ter users     1 2009-08-02 09:29 stamp.sys
> drwxr-xr-x 3 wa1ter users  4096 2008-12-07 15:30 uno_packages/
> -rw-r--r-- 1 wa1ter users 12288 2008-12-07 15:30 uno_packages.db



Here it is:

drwxr-xr-x 4 james   192 Aug  3 10:03 .
drwxr-xr-x 3 james    72 Aug  3 09:58 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 james   106 Aug  3 10:03 log.txt
drwxr-xr-x 8 james   520 Aug  3 09:58 registry
-rw-r--r-- 1 james     1 Aug  3 10:03 stamp.sys
drwxr-xr-x 2 james    48 Aug  3 09:58 uno_packages
-rw-r--r-- 1 james 12288 Aug  3 09:58 uno_packages.db


The .ooo3/user/uno_packages/cache/uno_packages is empty, 
the dir registry contains these files:


drwxr-xr-x 2 james  48 Aug  3 09:58
com.sun.star.comp.deployment.component.PackageRegistryBackend
drwxr-xr-x 3 james 112 Aug  3 09:58
com.sun.star.comp.deployment.configuration.PackageRegistryBackend
drwxr-xr-x 2 james  48 Aug  3 09:58
com.sun.star.comp.deployment.executable.PackageRegistryBackend
drwxr-xr-x 2 james  48 Aug  3 09:58
com.sun.star.comp.deployment.help.PackageRegistryBackend
drwxr-xr-x 2 james  48 Aug  3 09:58
com.sun.star.comp.deployment.script.PackageRegistryBackend
drwxr-xr-x 2 james  48 Aug  3 09:58
com.sun.star.comp.deployment.sfwk.PackageRegistryBackend


????


James

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[Dale]

James wrote:
> Dale <rdalek1967 <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>   
>> Usually if something runs as root but not a user, it's a permissions
>> issue.  You running something special on your system?  Hardened or
>> something more "secure"?
>>     
>
>
> Nope,
>
> It's been a normal (stable) gentoo workstation
> with OO for a couple of years.  KDE4 and X
> started this spiral downward, methinks.....
>
>
>  in /usr/bin  we see
>
>
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   76 Aug  2 14:34 oobase
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   76 Aug  2 14:34 oocalc
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 8.2K Aug  2 14:34 ooconfig
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   76 Aug  2 14:34 oodraw
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   71 Aug  2 14:34 ooffice
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   80 Aug  2 14:34 oofromtemplate
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   79 Aug  2 14:34 ooimpress
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   76 Aug  2 14:34 oomath
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 3.0K Aug  2 14:34 ootool
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   75 Aug  2 14:34 ooweb
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root   78 Aug  2 14:34 oowriter
>
>
> It starts up and throws that java runtime exception....
> I thought rebuilding dev-db/hsqldb might
> help, but no......
>
> Google for days now produces nothing....
>
> ???
>
>
> James
>
>
>
>   

Same here.  Have you tried renaming the config directory and letting it
recreate it fresh?  Sometimes that helps.  You know, the /home/<user
name>/.ooo3 directory?  You can rename it, move it or something then
restart OOo and see if it works. 

If that fails, kick it.  LOL

Dale

:-)  :-) 

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[James]

Dale <rdalek1967 <at> gmail.com> writes:


> Same here.  Have you tried renaming the config directory and letting it
> recreate it fresh?  Sometimes that helps.  You know, the /home/≤user
> name>/.ooo3 directory?  You can rename it, move it or something then
> restart OOo and see if it works. 

OK,

Well I tried that,
new .0003 dir created but same fault:

terminate called after throwing an instance of
'com::sun::star::uno::RuntimeException'


> If that fails, kick it.  LOL

If only that would help.....

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[walt]

On 08/02/2009 01:42 PM, James wrote:

> But look here:
>
> eix virtual/jdk
> [I] virtual/jdk
>       Available versions:
>          (1.4)   1.4.1 1.4.2
>          (1.5)   1.5.0
>          (1.6)   1.6.0
>       Installed versions:  1.4.2(1.4)(14:13:11 07/07/09) 1.6.0(1.6)(14:10:01

Ah, that was the jog my memory needed.  For reasons I don't know,
there was some old cruft remaining in either /etc/env.d or /etc/conf.d
or /etc/java-config-2, or maybe all three, that confused java-config.

I had to hand-edit files in one/all of those places before everything
started to work again.  Pretty sure that was the problem with oo, too.

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[James]

walt <w41ter <at> gmail.com> writes:


> Ah, that was the jog my memory needed.  For reasons I don't know,
> there was some old cruft remaining in either /etc/env.d or /etc/conf.d
> or /etc/java-config-2, or maybe all three, that confused java-config.

OK

> I had to hand-edit files in one/all of those places before everything
> started to work again.  Pretty sure that was the problem with oo, too.

Hmmmm,

Nothing stands out in the /etc/java-config-2 dir???

cat /etc/env.d/20java-config
MANPATH=/etc/java-config/system-vm/man/
CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK="/etc/env.d/java/"

Ideas on how to edit 20java-config are welcome?


Maybe edit /etc/conf.d/hsqldb   ????


Can you be more specific?
I've rebuild OO twice....

app-office/openoffice-3.1.0-r1  USE="cups dbus eds gnome 
gstreamer gtk java kde ldap nsplugin opengl pam "
<snip> LINGUAS="en en_GB en_US 

James

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[walt]

On 08/02/2009 01:42 PM, James wrote:
> walt<w41ter<at>  gmail.com>  writes:

> java-check-environment
> <snip>
> Java environment is sane. Congratulations!
>
> eselect java-vm list
> Available Java Virtual Machines:
>    [1]   sun-jdk-1.6  system-vm
>
> But look here:
>
> eix virtual/jdk
> [I] virtual/jdk
>       Available versions:
>          (1.4)   1.4.1 1.4.2
>          (1.5)   1.5.0
>          (1.6)   1.6.0
>       Installed versions:  1.4.2(1.4)(14:13:11 07/07/09) 1.6.0(1.6)(14:10:01
> 07/07/09)
>       Homepage:            http://java.sun.com/
>       Description:         Virtual for JDK

I forgot to ask last time: what printed the lines above? I don't recognize the
format from anything I have. This may be the real key to your problem.

My 20java-config is identical to yours, so that's not the problem.

Here is my /usr/lib/jvm:
$ls -l /usr/lib/jvm
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root    21 2008-04-20 09:24 sun-jdk-1.5 -> /opt/sun-jdk-1.5.0.15/
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root root    21 2009-07-01 05:50 sun-jdk-1.6 -> /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.14/

Here is my /etc/java-config-2:
$ls -lF /etc/java-config-2/
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 2009-07-01 05:48 build/
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root   25 2008-04-26 14:50 current-system-vm -> /usr/lib/jvm//sun-jdk-1.6/
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root   61 2009-01-13 22:33 virtuals

The file 'virtuals' and the two files in the 'build' directory have only example
items that are commented out.  Have a look there.

Either rename or delete your ~/.java directory.  Mine is often out of date even
thought theoretically we shouldn't need to worry about it.

And try renaming or deleting your ~/.ooo3 directory for the same reasons.

And 'grep -r 1.4.2 /etc/*' may turn up obsolete config files that you don't
know you have.  It's like rummaging through your attic :)

[gentoo-user] Re: Java jdk

[James]

walt <w41ter <at> gmail.com> writes:


> And 'grep -r 1.4.2 /etc/*' may turn up obsolete config files that you don't
> know you have.  It's like rummaging through your attic :)

Hello Walt,

fixing the file permission under:

/usr/lib64/openoffice/share/uno_packages/cache
 

did the trick for me.


thanks,
James