From: James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: package.keywords
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 15:49:40 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20090623T154419-254@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200906231705.05344.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon <at> gmail.com> writes:
> I cheat and just do this:
> x11-wm/enlightenment * ~* **
Does not work for xz-utils. Neil's post may be the reason,
but there is definately nothing I've read (in man pages)
to distinguish these anomalous cases....?
> But enlightenment is a special case. e17 has never had a release (snapshots
> that are known to build are not considered releases) and the majority of users
> simply check out and build the latest commits in svn. The way the ebuilds are
> versioned, enlightenment-9999 gets you the latest in svn.
> That's a pretty normal gentoo convention
> You need to put a mask after the package name - *, ~* or **. The default is to
> use your current ACCEPT_KEYWORDS.
> * removes masking keywords if the package is stable on your arch
> ~* removes masking keywords if the package is stable on any arch
> ** removes masking keywords for the package unconditionally
none of these worked for the
xz-utils package. Can we find a simple example that does work?
(not enlightenment).....?
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-23 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-22 13:58 [gentoo-user] package.keywords James
2009-06-22 14:08 ` Albert Hopkins
2009-06-22 14:18 ` [gentoo-user] package.keywords James
2009-06-22 15:14 ` Arttu V.
2009-06-22 15:51 ` James
2009-06-22 20:28 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-23 14:40 ` James
2009-06-23 14:54 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-06-23 15:28 ` James
2009-06-23 15:40 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-06-23 16:09 ` [gentoo-user] ReSOLVED: package.keywords James
2009-06-23 18:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-23 14:55 ` [gentoo-user] package.keywords Neil Bothwick
2009-06-23 15:36 ` James
2009-06-23 15:05 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-23 15:49 ` James [this message]
2009-06-23 18:39 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-22 22:17 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-22 23:17 ` Dale
2009-06-22 23:45 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-23 6:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-23 6:51 ` Dale
2009-06-23 7:33 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-23 7:38 ` Dale
2009-06-23 8:27 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-23 9:16 ` Weitao Sun
2009-06-23 9:18 ` Dale
2009-06-23 10:16 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-23 10:51 ` Arttu V.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20090623T154419-254@post.gmane.org \
--to=wireless@tampabay.rr.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox