From: James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: package.keywords
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 15:51:31 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20090622T154452-892@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: fecdbac60906220814i601f6dffk5f8e7e439926b595@mail.gmail.com
Arttu V. <arttuv69 <at> gmail.com> writes:
> More reading: ebuild(5)"
Ah, ok so there is not restriction on using any of the
the boolean operators in any config file underneath
/etc/portage? as section 5 does not mention any....
> So, as a conclusion, you probably want to use ~ instead of >= in there
> as you apparently are running a mostly stable box (arch) instead of
> testing (~arch)?
This is my (mis)conception, although, as you have suggest,
there are (gentoo) cultural norms that do suggest
certain boolean operations should not be used,
in say for example, package.keywords?
I'm mostly running stable with exceptions being enabled
via the /etc/portage file structure. Usually it's small,
but now with kde4, BLOAT is my modus operandi,
not by choice......
thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-22 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-22 13:58 [gentoo-user] package.keywords James
2009-06-22 14:08 ` Albert Hopkins
2009-06-22 14:18 ` [gentoo-user] package.keywords James
2009-06-22 15:14 ` Arttu V.
2009-06-22 15:51 ` James [this message]
2009-06-22 20:28 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-23 14:40 ` James
2009-06-23 14:54 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-06-23 15:28 ` James
2009-06-23 15:40 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-06-23 16:09 ` [gentoo-user] ReSOLVED: package.keywords James
2009-06-23 18:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-23 14:55 ` [gentoo-user] package.keywords Neil Bothwick
2009-06-23 15:36 ` James
2009-06-23 15:05 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-23 15:49 ` James
2009-06-23 18:39 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-22 22:17 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-22 23:17 ` Dale
2009-06-22 23:45 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-23 6:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-23 6:51 ` Dale
2009-06-23 7:33 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-23 7:38 ` Dale
2009-06-23 8:27 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-06-23 9:16 ` Weitao Sun
2009-06-23 9:18 ` Dale
2009-06-23 10:16 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-23 10:51 ` Arttu V.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20090622T154452-892@post.gmane.org \
--to=wireless@tampabay.rr.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox