From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZB7g-0002Nv-Hc for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 78F0CE0406; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58855E0406 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB64AB5187 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -2.9 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=0.699, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KGtfNCVudLsY for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0FEB47DC for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LZB7S-0002hz-Ln for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:14 +0000 Received: from buffer.net ([24.73.161.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:14 +0000 Received: from wireless by buffer.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:14 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Gentoo as a production server - insecure? Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:35:05 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <6b16fb4c0902160405t6a2fcd3alb069d8e1a869e509@mail.gmail.com> <200902161833.38055.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> <200902162134.05765.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 24.73.161.102 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20090210 SeaMonkey/1.1.14) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 43dcb7c7-b006-4557-80d8-11ea1e2628b0 X-Archives-Hash: 50ff26c5498ef0fa09f46e92df68894c Dirk Heinrichs online.de> writes: > I didn't reply to you, but to Johannes. Maybe your email client doesn't > display the threads correctly. You can verify this by reading the headers, > especially "In-reply-to:". > The original thread was about "Mailing Lists" to discuss about python or perl > and was started by Kaushal Shriyan. It was hijacked by replying to it and > changing the topic, again see the "In-reply-to:" header. OOPs, I did not even notice (sorry). Gmane does show the threads correctly (although sometimes it borks). My bad; I just saw your response under mine in gmane...... I missed the original thread poster completely. Sometimes gmane does not process all postings, timely. It'd help if you mentioned the persons name, explicitly, when you or anyone chastize a poster. But, IIIII missed it in the thread listing, so <...> on me. James