From: James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: php4 vs php5
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:36:18 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20060316T162423-758@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4418C0B2.7070807@badapple.net
kashani <kashani-list <at> badapple.net> writes:
> Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > Yes, but you need dev-lang/php-4*, not dev-php/php-4*. Unmerge the
> > blockers and dev-lang/php-4* will emerge. You don't need mod_php anymore,
> > it is provided by the apache(2) USE flags of dev-lang/php.
> > If the JFFNMS ebuild explicitly depends on dev-php/php, it is broken.
> > file a bug and add it to /etc/portage/profile/package.provided to work
> > around it until it is fixed (or fix the ebuild yourself).
> It looks like jffnms just hit portage at large on Monday. Still
> masked, but it's in there. Assuming James is using this version it seems
> happy to use to dev-lang/php-4.4.2
Well, I have gotten delayed, but when I get a few things done, I'll test
the latest JFFNMS with dev-lang/php-4.4.2. One of the devs has worked
on it, quite a lot lately. If more folks install JFFNMS and use it, we're
more likely to get better support from the devs.
> On a side note, didn't jffnms want java serverlets or some nonsense in
> the past? I seem to recall looking at it and then dropping it due to the
> requirements.
It has undergone many changes, as it is quite fluid as NMS. The website states
that it runs on PHP5 also, but, I have not had time to drill down into the
details. What's your adversion to Java Serverlets? (just curious).
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-16 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-15 1:35 [gentoo-user] php4 vs php5 James
2006-03-15 1:59 ` JimD
2006-03-15 2:00 ` Michael Stewart (vericgar)
2006-03-15 2:11 ` kashani
2006-03-15 3:35 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2006-03-15 3:45 ` kashani
2006-03-15 9:03 ` Neil Bothwick
2006-03-15 16:32 ` James
2006-03-16 1:34 ` kashani
2006-03-16 17:36 ` James [this message]
2006-03-16 18:18 ` kashani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20060316T162423-758@post.gmane.org \
--to=wireless@tampabay.rr.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox