From: James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Network collisions
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2005 14:04:30 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20051004T154250-885@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 43426603.9020307@daveoxley.co.uk
Dave Oxley <dave <at> daveoxley.co.uk> writes:
> Yeah, its a hub. I'll stop trying to set it to full duplex now.
> It is 40 times quicker in one direction than the other. Can you
> give me a hint where to go from here.
Try connecting the 2 systems with only a 'cross-over cable' run the applications
and make measurements. If this results in an increase in the bandwidth
in either direction, you may want to put systems back on the hub, and
have a third system run ethereal. Look at your data traffic and see
if anythingelse is using the bandwidth from either of these 2 system
or what else is plug into the hub/switch.
Is the hub a 10Mbps only hub/switch, check that. On 10 Mbps ethernet
hubs,you can never reach the full 10 Mbps, in fact with many systems
chattering,the practical throughput is marginally around 33%.
If when you are on the cross over cable and you get similar poor
results,then the problem may be in the ethernet driver code,
kernel, irq settings or
some other low level part of the kernel/modules, especially if
you get the same skewed results with several different
applications moving data between the systems. But, if when
you move data between these 2 isolated system, and
get different bandwidth performance semantics, then the problem
is most likely between the applications or a bottleneck in the
application code (poor data structure for example).
Make sure you computers are not resource limited, thus blocking
the processthat you are running to move the data. Top and ntop
are just a few toolsto help track down these sort of issues.
Sadly, you may have a complex mix of part or all of these
aforementioned issues...
hth,
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-04 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-04 5:28 [gentoo-user] Network collisions Dave Oxley
2005-10-04 9:46 ` Mark Knecht
2005-10-04 10:00 ` Dave Oxley
2005-10-04 10:16 ` kashani
2005-10-04 11:22 ` Dave Oxley
2005-10-04 11:40 ` Jonathan Wright
2005-10-04 14:04 ` James [this message]
2005-10-05 10:59 ` [gentoo-user] " Dave Oxley
2005-10-04 9:53 ` [gentoo-user] " Uwe Thiem
2005-10-05 1:31 ` Dave Oxley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20051004T154250-885@post.gmane.org \
--to=wireless@tampabay.rr.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox