From: James <wireless@tampabay.rr.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: iptables example on Gentoo
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 19:11:24 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20050907T210545-761@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 431F2E02.4090909@planet.nl
Holly Bostick <motub <at> planet.nl> writes:
> Good morning, this is the general users list. If you want the security
> experts, try
> gentoo-security For the discussion of security issues and fixes
> gentoo-hardened For a security hardened version of Gentoo
You mean I have to go to this group to find detailed documentation
in iptables/netfilter rulesets that are indeed secure, published,
and used in more than one place?
> If you want to discuss comparisons between Gentoo and BSD, this might be
> the place:
agreeded
> That's all I'm going to say in the face of all this needlessly insulting
> behaviour.
Holly, I have not nor do not intend to insult or constipate anyone.
Sincere apologies. However, I find this very strange that published
rulesets do not exist for iptables/netfilter, for simple and common
things lick a home-office router with (3) nics, including LAN, WAN
and DMZ with optional web and dns(internal) servers. If you find my
sharing these thoughts with you, and the 50 times I've had to write
that I'm interested in iptables/netfilters and not shorewall, then
I think you are a bit too sensitive about divergent opinions.
sincerely,
James
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-07 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-06 17:22 [gentoo-user] iptables example on Gentoo James
2005-09-06 17:39 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-06 17:53 ` Holly Bostick
2005-09-06 18:25 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2005-09-06 19:04 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-06 20:00 ` James
2005-09-06 20:39 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-07 0:02 ` gentuxx
2005-09-07 1:20 ` W.Kenworthy
2005-09-07 13:08 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-07 17:06 ` James
2005-09-07 18:14 ` Holly Bostick
2005-09-07 19:11 ` James [this message]
2005-09-07 19:53 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-08 18:14 ` James
2005-09-08 19:30 ` kashani
2005-09-07 20:09 ` Holly Bostick
2005-09-07 18:40 ` gentuxx
2005-09-07 19:29 ` James
2005-09-07 19:56 ` gentuxx
2005-09-07 20:49 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-07 18:48 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-07 22:08 ` James
2005-09-07 23:51 ` gentuxx
2005-09-08 1:23 ` James
2005-09-08 9:20 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-08 17:43 ` James
2005-09-08 16:19 ` James
2005-09-08 16:42 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-09 9:44 ` Michael Kintzios
2005-09-09 13:38 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-08 17:35 ` Neil Bothwick
2005-09-09 0:52 ` Jerry McBride
2005-09-07 23:52 ` Rumen Yotov
2005-09-07 18:48 ` James
2005-09-07 19:44 ` [gentoo-user] " Bryan Whitehead
2005-09-08 1:34 ` [gentoo-user] " James
2005-09-08 15:37 ` Rumen Yotov
2005-09-09 11:19 ` [gentoo-user] " Timo Boettcher
2005-09-09 14:23 ` Dave Nebinger
2005-09-10 17:04 ` Timo Boettcher
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20050907T210545-761@post.gmane.org \
--to=wireless@tampabay.rr.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox