From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsPpP-0000tb-Sp for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:50:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with SMTP id j6CIlnqW016373; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:47:49 GMT Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [134.68.220.30]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j6CIgmNI000913 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:42:48 GMT Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by smtp.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DsPjI-00089j-3G for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:43:40 +0000 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DsPhH-0002nV-OE for gentoo-user@gentoo.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:41:35 +0200 Received: from buffer.net ([24.73.161.102]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:41:35 +0200 Received: from wireless by buffer.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 20:41:35 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org From: James Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: where is the functionality of etcat Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <200507112325.06903.rudmer@legolas.dynup.net> <20050711234717.4aaa9dfa@mating-tux.renatik.de> <200507121921.05169.rudmer@legolas.dynup.net> <42D3FD36.3010200@planet.nl> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 24.73.161.102 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050517) Sender: news X-Archives-Salt: 71fc1231-af02-4f4d-b70d-f081a8b5e7e2 X-Archives-Hash: 0568bd0f4d540b08dc41c4def9c1c144 Holly Bostick planet.nl> writes: > > Holly: eix is probably not it, since it looks like it does not show the > > availability of the package (masked+keyword), but thanks for the suggestion! > Actually, it most certainly does; keyworded packages are shown in brown > with a ~ in front, masked packages are listed in red with a [M] in front. > Of course you can use what suits you best; just wanted to clear up the > misconception. Well 'eix zoneminder' shows '~0.9.12 ~1.21.2' both in brown. emerge -s zoneminders shows that it is masked in red and only 1.21.2. is available. Maybe my color scheme is messed up? James -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list